To: MACVSOG68
"So the polls are not correct? "
The best polls are what the majority of consitituents tell their congressmen, who are up for re-election in November,in very strong terms.
Even SEN. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON (R), TEXAS, who is a Senator has had an earful from fer up constituents, who are overwhelmingly AGINST amnesty as in:
DOBBS: And senator, Senator McCain is saying you are doing the will of the American people. Where in the world -- what planet is he on?
HUTCHISON: Well, Lou, I think that he's very sincere, and I think that...
DOBBS: Well, I am not talking about his sincerity. I am sure he is sincere. I am just asking where in the world is his attachment to reality?
HUTCHISON: Well, it's not what I am hearing from my constituents. I have been doing phone tallies, of course, to know where people are, e-mails, faxes and phone tallies. And this week I had 1,578 call in against the bill and 12 called in for it. That's what I'm hearing everywhere I go.
Polls are fine, but even more important is what constituents tell their congressmen, and the actual voting in November.
48 posted on
07/15/2006 12:16:25 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: Jameison
The best polls are what the majority of consitituents tell their congressmen, who are up for re-election in November,in very strong terms.Ok, I think I understand now. The polls you posted were all good, but the polls from May and June are irrelevant because polls are not as good as constituent feedback. Gotcha!
A 2 minute discussion with Lou Dobbs throws out every poll...except yours.
If Ted Kennedy cited that 95% of his constituents were in favor of a guest worker program, would you then conclude that the information was more reliable than random polls? Or is it just certain senators whose calls are reliable?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson