[MACVSOG68]

No straw men in that. You are fishing again.

Ah, so because of Chamberlain's failure to recognize Hitler's ambitions, that should be our cue that the Republican House should not negotiate with the Republican Senate? Well, I see what you mean. Pretty clear comparisons, I'd say.

No deal is better than a bad deal that toy pay for heavily in the future.Explaining things to dunderhead is just so hard. Sigh.

Toy pay for in the future? Dunderhead? Uh, ok. Point taken.

[Jameison]

"Ah, so because of Chamberlain's failure to recognize Hitler's ambitions, that should be our cue that the Republican House should not negotiate with the Republican Senate? "

Because Chamberlain was desperate to sign an agreement at all costs, so he signed a bad one, with devastating consequences for everyone later.
We should not sign a bad Senate Bill just because we "need" to get an immigration bill at all costs (there was a time when an attempt was made to panic everyone into getting bill signed by November's elections at all costs. Luckily the Republican House members weren't buying that crap).
We should have a new immigration bill because its the right immigration bill for Americans.
Otherwise, no new immigration bill.