Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BruceysMom
If you can't afford children why continue to have them and let people who pay taxes foot the bill?

NOWHERE does the article state that the family is being completely sustained by the government. You're jumping to conclusions.

And you're insulting, I am completely anit-abortion except for when the mother's life is in danger.

Then you're not completely anti-abortion, are you?

Maybe a reading comprehension course would help.

Now you're the one being insulting.

14 posted on 07/12/2006 10:38:07 PM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Love is the fusion of two souls in one in order to bring about mutual perfection." -S. Terese Andes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Pyro7480

Precisely junior,the article says that only one person works in a family of nine, unless dad is very wealthy they cannot afford medical, food, clothes, transportation, and life in general for nine people. They live in a one bedroom apartment, and have lived there even after having the first three children. In many places that is illegal. No I do not believe that a mother, with other children, should sacrifice her life for the life of an unborn child. I am Jewish and I believe that the needless sacrifice of a life is a sin. When you grow up you'll learn that when you insult someone they often insult you back. Better learn to take it if you're going to dish it out. Funny how you say "NOWHERE does the article state that the family is being completely sustained by the government." That "completely" in your reply speaks volumes.


15 posted on 07/12/2006 10:56:28 PM PDT by BruceysMom (I'm hot & not in a good way: menopause ain't for sissies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson