Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I don't mind a mission back to the moon, however, I don't think it should be an international mission. Us yanks should control the moon, Mars and beyond..
1 posted on 07/10/2006 5:51:11 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

2 posted on 07/10/2006 5:51:46 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

I wonder what the North Korean Lander would look like?


3 posted on 07/10/2006 5:53:36 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
If we are going back to the old tried and true way of getting to the moon, then lets remember that was a American effort not a international one. Keep the construction in house.

Look at the current iss and then look back at Skylab.

4 posted on 07/10/2006 5:58:02 PM PDT by Kakaze (American: a Citizen of the United States of America........not just some resident of said continent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
International cooperation and design by committee has done wonders for the ISS, can't wait to see this applied to a lunar lander.

Did I sound sarcastic? No really, did I?
7 posted on 07/10/2006 7:33:45 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

great.

Another partnership that we can spend money supporting, instead of really doing something meaningful, in something besides low earth orbit.

We didn't learn anything from our "partnership" with the Russians on building ISS.


10 posted on 07/10/2006 7:55:06 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

International - Barf! Noway.


12 posted on 07/10/2006 8:14:28 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

About the only benefit to making something like this international is that congress tends to support it over long periods of time.
It's not about going to the moon in congress' eyes, it's about maintaining "good international relations with our partners".
This is the only thing that spared the ISS the congressional chopping block in the 90's.
It's only value is in symbolic posturing internationally.


15 posted on 07/10/2006 9:18:34 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

No Quarter......

.....the moon is ours...time to regain control.


Screw the rest of the world!


19 posted on 07/11/2006 3:12:21 AM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein(the moon is a harsh mistress))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
Us yanks should control the moon, Mars and beyond..

Right on! And only ENGLISH spoken there!

21 posted on 07/11/2006 5:27:34 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Former SAC Trained Killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

No. No. No. HELL No.

I'm working with a Belgian group on a NASA project right now. ITAR is a *nightmare* for international collaborations. I don't want to *think* about how that affects man-rated hardware.


25 posted on 07/11/2006 8:51:56 PM PDT by MikeD (We live in a world where babies are like velveteen rabbits that only become real if they are loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson