Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

So much for "can't be reproduced in a lab."

Of course, the fall back(s) will be:

(1)"this proves intelligent design, not evolution!"

(2) "yeah, but it's still an XYZ. It didn't change into a ABC." and/or

(3) "These traits already existed; there's nothing new here."


4 posted on 07/10/2006 11:35:23 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan

So much for "can't be reproduced in a lab."

Of course, the fall back(s) will be:

(1)"this proves intelligent design, not evolution!"

(2) "yeah, but it's still an XYZ. It didn't change into a ABC." and/or

(3) "These traits already existed; there's nothing new here."




"Falling back" on reason is such a nasty habit.


24 posted on 07/10/2006 12:08:42 PM PDT by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: MeanWestTexan

It certainly does not prove or even demonstrate anything about evolution.


107 posted on 07/10/2006 3:08:11 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson