To: Lexinom
"The notion that there is such a category as "pigeon" is "silly"?"
No, but the category isn't a species category. You said there was only one species of pigeon. In fact there are over 200.
"If words had no meaning, as you seem to suggest my FRiend,..."
I suggested no such thing. It was you who used *species* in a way that would give it no meaning.
"The point is, organs as vastly complex as the mammalian eye, stand as irreducibly complex examples of something designed for a purpose..."
No, they don't. Behe (and Paley, the guy he stole that from) was wrong.
"One would sound rather ridiculous if he tried to explain how such a marvelous organ could arise piecemeal."
Only if it was assumed that the mammalian eye *poofed* out fo nowhere.
"Hence, punctuated equalibrium i.e. don't you dare question the theory."
Um, no. PE is still a gradual process. It is only *fast* in geological time. We are still talking about tens of thousands of years between speciation events.
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Order/genus/species are categories. Pigeon is a category on some level. Species is probably more granular as you've suggested. I don't know, I don't care, I should have used the word category.
Gotta run now.
185 posted on
07/13/2006 10:37:15 AM PDT by
Lexinom
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson