Posted on 07/10/2006 8:41:39 AM PDT by girlangler
It may have been USDAA because the classes sound familiar. They are a booger to work, it takes so many people. Our golden club here is toying with the idea of gettting into that, and I'm like, OH PLEASE regular specialties are plenty enough work! Have you done rally? It really looks like fun, I've stewarded that a couple of times (another pain to steward!) but it looks like it would be a nice step before novice obedience.
susie
"If you are interested in multi purpose dogs, by all means,use that as a gauge when looking for a puppy. Of course, be aware that a CD title does not really mean much. (OK, except when you get one you feel pretty darned good about it!)"
In America? Actually having a self-controlled obedient dog is a *rarity*! (I mean in the real world, not just those who actually go to shows.) Most cannot handle a CD (and only part of it is on lead, so there's no way most dogs in the US can do it - if only because their owners have let it be so). IMO, there are dogs who are virtually incorrigible, and if they truly can't manage a CD, they probably DO have a mental/emotional flaw (I can just see my Tara fitting in there). This is a minimal test - so is it so much to ask it be a requirement?
Agreed the AKC is technically "just a registry". However, they sure get their hands in a heck of alot of stuff to be just that. And there's no reason they could NOT expand their scope. Heck, FTM, if they're only a registry, why do they even come up with rules for conformation or any performance at all? Why have they forbidden "schutzhund" until the last month or so? They have alot of power for just a registry.
Yes, I know about misc too. (I was involved in the spinone breed for years as we tried and finally succeeded in getting them out of misc. and into regular AKC registration--I think the breed was in misc longer than any other breed).
I wondered if they weren't in misc at that time, but it doesn't really say. Somewhere out there is the info tho. ;)
susie
LOL
Maddie's new slogan
We manage to get the necessary staffing! (I have lots of free T-shirts in every conceivable color and design!)
Thanks
Maddie is so cute. Any new pictures?
Already seen that. All they show you is when the *CURRENT* STANDARD was approved. They do not even tell you what revision it is.
The latest GS standard was approved 1978. The GS has been in the AKC since 1913.
We need a real history, and even the AB&TCC doesn't give it to us on their site. But their winners history indicates it was c. 1980. I know B&Ts were recognized when I was running around shows c. 1985.
I agree with you about Chows and those modern show GSD.
They look like their rear-end is collapsing.
No wonder they have hip dysplacia problems. I can't see how anybody can find that attractive or useful.
I really don't understand your point. I'm going to just let you have your rant.
susie
Oh, I know all about the anti-AKC thing from the Border Collie lovers (my aunt being 1 and having had/bred some 20 of them by now).
BTW, again - if AKC is "just a registry", why do so many breeds want to avoid it like the plague? :D
You know, everybody has sort of a "picture" flash in their minds when a word, usually a noun is spoken or read.
That beautiful creature flashes in my mind whenever I hear "dog" or read the word.
I miss my Frieda.
I had a July hound. We called him a coonhound but he was really an American foxhound.
Got him to hunt but he turned into a pet.
Great with the kids.
Our club was a small start up, and we went to the bigger established club to help with their trials. It was a great learning experience, and fun, but it really was alot of work. Our specialty club here has trouble getting enough real workers for our specialties as it is, I can't imagine adding something as labor intensive as agility! However, I don't get to make that call, and if we do add it, heck, I'll be out tehre running my rear end off, I'm sure!
susie
OK. :)
I just think some kind of performance should be required before a dog can get a conformation title. You might be amazed how much it would do to keep the cliquish national-breed-club conformation snobs from ruling what "desirable looks" are.
I haven't read the standard. I wonder what it actually describes? I know in goldens we have had things that became popular, even tho they did not really follow the standard. (coat for instance!)
susie
I'm going to look at my old AKC book. Maybe it says. The 'net doesn't always have everything on it!
I've been curious about the American Eskimo (now that I find it is BACK in AKC recognition). My parents' old '40s set of Encyc. Americana had a dog section, where it showed the American Eskimo as a recognized breed! But in the '80s, it was not. Then apparently in the '90s it is recognized. Is this a breed that "disappeared" and then reappeared? I'm mystified that something like that could happen.
Thanks :)
Yes but I gotta make time to host them
Got some new horse pics too, I gotta host as well
See:
http://www.gsdca.org/Noframes/standard/IllStan1.htm
I'm not sure from the standard if that kind of build is really called for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.