[skeeter]

WSJ says lots of things, doesn't mean they're in control of our government.

Good G*d, leaping to conclusions like that, no wonder you think everyone else is nutz.

Would you agree that the WSJ often contains musings of leading economic thinkers & think tanks from which administrations have occasionally been known to draw ideas for policy? Is it really so outrageous to imagine that there there are some in positions of influence who think a EU style union might be a good thing for our hemisphere as well?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Good G*d, leaping to conclusions like that, no wonder you think everyone else is nutz.

So what conclusion were you leading me to here?

Your favorite publication, the WSJ, was writing stories about a union of American nations ala the EU twenty years ago.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Would you agree that the WSJ often contains musings of leading economic thinkers & think tanks from which administrations have occasionally been known to draw ideas for policy?

Sure.

Is it really so outrageous to imagine that there there are some in positions of influence who think a EU style union might be a good thing for our hemisphere as well?

No. So? Does that prove Corsi's fantasy about the Amero is more likely? Because Bush never mentioned it, Bush must be pushing it? Was that in the WSJ too?