Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/08/2006 5:09:45 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Brightside
They had met on the Internet

Well, there's your first clue.

2 posted on 07/08/2006 5:16:06 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

"dumped Callahan after finding evidence on his computer that he had been trolling for women on the Internet and after learning he was married"

lol internet.


3 posted on 07/08/2006 5:19:37 AM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (Loose lips sink ships and the NYT is the Bermuda triangle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
Judge Rolando T. Acosta said that because Brian Callahan was still married ... the agreement to marry was void.

Hmmmm... That certainly didn't stop my now ex-wife from running off with another man and agreeing to marry him while she was married to me.

4 posted on 07/08/2006 5:20:37 AM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
He is lucky that he got off so cheap. If the dumba$$ had married her, he would have ended up paying her much more in the not too distant future.
7 posted on 07/08/2006 5:34:58 AM PDT by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

Didn't I read once of a woman forcing the return of a ring given by her husband to another woman, on the theory that he had given commonly held property away to another, without the wife's permission? Maybe the wife could sue to force the return of the ring.


8 posted on 07/08/2006 6:10:42 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

Never get between a woman and your money.


9 posted on 07/08/2006 6:14:33 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside
I'm confused here.Had they set a date? And if so,was the date that was set *before* his divorce would have been final under Massachusetts law?

If the answer to either question is "no",then I can't see him having done anything so wrong as to entitle her to $40K.

Yah,cruising the web for babes is a good reason for her to dump him.And not having told her of his marriage also gives her good reason to be ticked off.

But not to the tune of $40K.

10 posted on 07/08/2006 6:29:31 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

From an old Joan Rivers stand-up routine:

"If you break an engagement and don't want to give the ring back, swallow it. No man will look through sh!* for a diamond."

(Pause for the REAL punchline....)

"Barbara Bush told me that, and she's absolutely right."


14 posted on 07/08/2006 7:06:16 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

Good for her.
Since he was married, the ring was not an "engagement ring", but a gift.
Legally, you can keep gifts.
I am unsure of the legal status for engagement rings...traditionally if you break an engagement you send it back. If he breaks it, you can keep it...
Since essentially he "broke" the engagement because he had no intention of marrying her, she should keep the ring.
Serves the SOB right.


18 posted on 07/08/2006 7:56:29 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Brightside

$40,000. for a 3.4 caret diamond? Wow, am I out of the loop!


19 posted on 07/09/2006 2:53:07 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson