Yes, the "pit bulls" should have contained themselves behind a fence they couldn't jump.lol
You are very irrational about this subject, even to the extent in the past of calling dogs "evil"
and now you are advocating that dogs be allowed to roam the neighborhood uncontrolled
(you do realize that is what happened in this case, don't you?).
I pinged you to this thread to bring your attention to the Virginia law posted at #263.
From past threads you indicated you were willing to look at other options to deal with the problem of dog attacks.
Where is your analysis of post #263?
On this thread you asked for responses to a proposal you made.
We responded to you and in turn asked you questions....and you disappeared.
Are you going to respond on that thread?
Someone should not have to fear that if there dog goes running fown the street without a leash, gets out of their control for an instance, that they should have to worry about a pitbull mauling it.
As for my being uninformed on the issue, that really has nothing to do with making law. And that is what ultimately counts. Uniforned yet able to convince a city council t ban pitbulls is the argument that will win the day.
And before you misread that to mean that I agree with you that I am uninformed on this issue, that is not view.
By the way, did you see the story from yesterday of the toddler now undergoing extensive facial reconstruction because the family pitbull "that had been gentle for eight years" decided it all of a sudden did not like the child.
I repeat. All pitbulls in neighborhoods should be bnanned. Any pitbull found off their leash and off the owners property should be confiscated and immedicately put down (killed).