Good idea! Then the Pits could have jumped the fence to attack both her and her dog./sarc
Are you actually implying that her immediate presence would have stopped 2 Pits that jumped a fence to attack?
Or are you implying that no one should be in the neighbors drive where the Pits could be tempted to attack?
Sarcasm noted. Highly effective.
Are you actually implying that her immediate presence would have stopped 2 Pits that jumped a fence to attack?
No. I am implying anyone who loves an animal prone to being a victim has an obligation keep it away from danger. As a side note, without being familiar with the pits in question, it is impossible to say whether her presence would have stopped an attack. Pits are notoriously dog-aggressive, but can at the same time be people-friendly.
Or are you implying that no one should be in the neighbors drive where the Pits could be tempted to attack?
I didn't imply that, but now that you said it, I have to agree with you. While the pits weren't justified in jumping the fence, and their owners are liable, and their owners are utterly irresponsible and should be held to account... still, a prudent pet owner would realize that pits are pits. They are animals. They don't think in terms of morality, justice, or whatever. If they are dog aggressive, as most pits are, they want to kill dogs and are singularly capable of doing so. A proactive pet owner would avoid them the same way he or she would avoid any animal that poses a threat.
Remember what Rush said after gay what's his name was mauled--"A lion is a lion."