Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: arizonarachel; GVnana

That's just not right.

Becky


125 posted on 07/04/2006 9:04:44 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
I think she ought to be able to recover at least half the vet bill, if not a larger percentage, and she should press for them to pay a share as part of the expense of owning dangerous dogs.

I would assign blame and responsibility to both parties here. Her dog was loose, but the pits were effectively also loose. I think the liability for keeping dangerous aggressive dogs contained is a lot higher than the liability for letting a cocker be loose... simply because of their propensity to cause damage.

130 posted on 07/04/2006 9:12:12 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson