Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Yes, they found a 3 mm in diameter hard piece of bone that had to be treated with acids to get it *softened*. There were no blood cells, nor DNA found. It was as much *meat* as a pet rock is alive.

Says you... Here's what the Reuters article had to say:

Paleontologists forced to break the creature's massive thighbone to get it on a helicopter found not a solid piece of fossilized bone, but instead something looking a bit less like a rock.

When they got it into a lab and chemically removed the hard minerals, they found what looked like blood vessels, bone cells and perhaps even blood cells.

"They are transparent, they are flexible," said Mary Higby Schweitzer of North Carolina State University and Montana State University, who conducted the study.

She said the vessels were flexible and in some cases their contents could be squeezed out.

"The microstructures that look like cells are preserved in every way," added Schweitzer, whose findings were published in the journal Science.

"Preservation of this extent, where you still have this flexibility and transparency, has never been seen in a dinosaur before." Feathers, hair and fossilized egg contents yes, but not truly soft tissue.

Studying the soft tissues may help answer many questions about dinosaurs. Were they cold-blooded like reptiles, warm-blooded like mammals, or somewhere in-between? How are they related to living animals?

"If we can isolate certain proteins, then perhaps we can address the issue of the physiology of the dinosaur," Schweitzer said.


306 posted on 07/03/2006 8:36:21 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: tomzz
"Says you... Here's what the Reuters article had to say:"

The researchers, you know, the people who actually worked with the specimen, agree with me. You are posting the initial press release, not the actual write up from the scientists, nor the follow ups. There was no DNA found, nor intact cells, nor anything even close to *meat*. The area in question had a diameter of 3mm. Those are the facts, whether creationists want to accept it or not.

They aren't even sure if there is ANY original material in the bone.
311 posted on 07/03/2006 8:42:08 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson