Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: butternut_squash_bisque
I wonder if the idea to call it "homeland" security instead of "national" security was to down play the idea of nation status. From what I understand they would like to eliminate our northern and southern borders and have a continental homeland.
17 posted on 07/03/2006 6:08:19 AM PDT by nitzy (Every man needs a credo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: nitzy

Phyllis Schlafly nails it, here...

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html


25 posted on 07/03/2006 6:25:04 AM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage. Try it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy

Perhaps it's because "homeland security" refers to securing our country itself against threats, while national security can include a wide range of activities that involve maintaining the US's strategic position in the world.


44 posted on 07/03/2006 6:38:11 AM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy
I wonder if the idea to call it "homeland" security instead of "national" security was to down play the idea of nation status. From what I understand they would like to eliminate our northern and southern borders and have a continental homeland.

Every time I hear the word "homeland" in relation to our country I cringe. I guess I'm not teutonic enough. 

129 posted on 07/03/2006 11:42:22 AM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson