Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2006 9:22:00 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

2 posted on 06/29/2006 9:28:18 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

The whole story paints a kinda gloomy picture of the future of private space flight. Of course, I have no hope of ever flying into space anyway -- these systems are just toys of the very rich, and will remain so for quite some time. I think the main obstacle to it is that there's a limited number of people who will pay to do it once, hardly anyone who will (or can) pay to do it more than once, and significantly lowering costs is something that is very hard to do.


3 posted on 06/29/2006 10:18:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

To orbit, a space craft needs to achieve a velocity of 7.75 Km/sec, or 27,900 Km/hr, or 44,900 MPH at an altitude of 250 Km or just over 150 mi.

Burt Rutan's SpaceShipOne achieved a velocity of zero MPH at an altitude of 100 km, or just under 67 mi.

That is the difference between a space craft and a thrill ride.


4 posted on 06/30/2006 10:51:08 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson