Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rface; dead; aculeus; Senator Bedfellow; BlueLancer; Dog Gone; Billthedrill; martin_fierro; ...
Calling a judge a wanker not contempt: Vic Court of Appeal
15 posted on 06/28/2006 12:32:08 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dighton; Tijeras_Slim; martin_fierro; dead
Heh. From your link:

"There was another case where a defendant actually dropped their trousers in court, bent over and showed the judge the words 'Happy Christmas' written on their behind, and that was found not to be in contempt also. I think that defendant was probably fairly lucky, I might say."

23 posted on 06/28/2006 12:38:19 PM PDT by Constitution Day (Down with Half-Assery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: dighton
Oh...man...after reading that link, I'm literally in tears laughing.

Quote of the year, at the very least:

RICHARD LEADER: Yes. What actually tends to happen with insults to judges is that findings of contempt are not made. There was another case where a defendant actually dropped their trousers in court, bent over and showed the judge the words 'Happy Christmas' written on their behind, and that was found not to be in contempt also. I think that defendant was probably fairly lucky, I might say.
ROTFLMAO
28 posted on 06/28/2006 12:46:19 PM PDT by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: dighton

Ahhhhh, so now we understand why judges don't wear pants underneath their robes ...


44 posted on 06/28/2006 1:09:55 PM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson