Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alwaysconservative; patriciaruth

When Michael Gambon replaced Harris, I liked him better. He was more animated, more emotional, more interesting. But then I hadn't read much. Now that I've read the 6, I am forced to agree. He's not a good Dumbledore. Rowling stresses over and over how calm and tranquil and almost unearthly Dumbledore is; Gambon doesn't get any of that.


97 posted on 06/27/2006 9:05:31 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: BibChr

The way he screamed at Harry after Harry's name came out of the Goblet was absolutely ridiculous. It is totally out of character. I can't believe the director allowed it.

Anyone notice that they had Parvati and Padma BOTH in Gryffindor? Padma is supposed to be in Ravenclaw.


127 posted on 06/27/2006 10:55:12 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Nearly 1% of illegals are in prison for felonies. Less than 1/10 of 1% of the legal population is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr

I think the thing he is most lacking is the kindness that Richard Harris had shining from his eyes. His Dumbledore looked the characters in the eyes, and there was a spark of warmth that is so lacking in Gambon.

I miss Richard Harris so!


131 posted on 06/27/2006 11:13:40 AM PDT by alwaysconservative ("Earth laughs in flowers" Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson