To: bwteim
I'm always surprised that a man down doesn't make a quicker difference - if at all.
As strange as it sounds, but during the first quarter to half hour after the ejection it's often a disadvantage for both sides, as the other team also has to adapt to the different situation.
Just look at Germany-Sweden: Germany looked strong during the first 30 minutes and towards the end, in between their gameplay was slightly off-balance (they were still the dominant team, though).
However, as time passes, being one man down becomes more and more of a problem, as you have to cover the same space with fewer man. The team lacking a man thus suffers from exhaustion earlier. Just look at the US team (being two men down) after the match against Italy: They dropped like flies after the final whistle - they didn't have a single minute more in them.
119 posted on
06/26/2006 9:46:43 AM PDT by
wolf78
To: wolf78; kabar; UKRaddell; cartan
Well, it's over now. One up didn't do it for the Aussies.
And thank you for your responses, all, to my 11-1 question.
144 posted on
06/26/2006 10:00:09 AM PDT by
bwteim
(bwteim = Begin With The End In Mind. Saving your finger every day: Oct 5, 2001)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson