Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DA plans to turn over more papers in lacrosse case (DukeLax)
The Herald-Sun ^ | June 22, 2006 | John Stevenson

Posted on 06/22/2006 2:23:47 AM PDT by abb

DURHAM -- District Attorney Mike Nifong plans to give defense lawyers at least 300 additional pages of information about the Duke University lacrosse rape case, adding to 1,298 pages of documentation surrendered previously.

Without describing their contents, Nifong said the new documents would be handed over during a preliminary hearing today for three recently indicted lacrosse players: Collin Finnerty, Reade Seligmann and David Evans.

The three are accused of raping, sodomizing and restraining an exotic dancer in a bathroom during an off-campus party at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. in mid-March.

All are free under $400,000 bonds as they await a trial that, according to Nifong, might begin next spring.

None is expected to attend today's hearing.

In addition to a transfer of documents, the hearing will include a request from Seligmann's lawyers that his bond be lowered to roughly one-tenth its current level. The lawyers filed an affidavit in support of that request Wednesday.

Signed by Philip Seligmann, the defendant's father, the affidavit said that Seligmann had been recruited by every Ivy League university to play football or lacrosse, and that he accepted a 90-percent scholarship to be on the Duke lacrosse team.

"This case has taken an unbelievable and horrendous emotional toll on all my family, especially my wife," the elder Seligmann wrote. "We are committed as a family, along with Reade, to do everything necessary to restore our good name."

According to the affidavit, Seligmann's bail money was provided by a family friend whose "loss of income is substantial" as a result.

In a related matter, the News and Observer Publishing Co. moved Wednesday to make public certain documents -- reportedly pertaining to the alleged rape victim's medical records -- that were filed by defense lawyers under seal.

"In this case, the fact that there are charges of sexual assault is unfortunate and controversial -- either because a woman has been sexually violated or because the defendants have been wrongfully accused -- but neither is a justification for sealing a court proceeding," a lawyer for the newspaper wrote.

The lawyer, Hugh Stevens, also said the sealed documents raised questions about Nifong's handling of the case. He said that when the conduct of public officials is at issue, it is an added reason for making the pertinent files public.

Meanwhile, several defense lawyers predicted Wednesday that Nifong's latest 300-plus pages of documentation would do little to help him, since earlier paperwork -- in their view -- was more beneficial to the defense than the prosecution.

For example, attorneys Joe Cheshire and Brad Bannon have said the earlier documents showed a "very significant and disturbing deficiency" in Nifong's evidence.

Specifically, there were indications that Nifong began making public statements about the accuser's medical records even before they were in his possession, according to the two lawyers, who represent Evans.

Cheshire and Bannon said the District Attorney's Office subpoenaed the accuser's medical files from Duke Hospital on March 20 -- six days after the alleged rape.

However, the files were not printed out in compliance with the subpoena until March 30, and Police Investigator Benjamin Himan didn't pick them up until April 5, Cheshire and Bannon wrote in court paperwork last week.

But the lawyers said Nifong told a local television station on March 27 that he had no doubt the exotic dancer was raped, based on a "personal review" of her medical records. They quoted the district attorney as saying, "My reading of the report of the emergency room nurse would indicate that some type of sexual assault did in fact take place."

Citing the 1,298 pages of documentation given them by Nifong earlier, various defense lawyers also have contended there were numerous inconsistencies in the accuser's version of events, along with unacceptable omissions in a sworn affidavit prepared by police. The affidavit was used by Himan to obtain judicial permission for his evidence-gathering efforts.

Among other things, Himan failed to mention that a co-dancer had described the rape allegation as "a crock," even though she was with the accuser for all but about five minutes on the night in question, according to defense lawyers.

Nifong has bristled at that and other defense characterizations of his evidence, while attacking the national press corps for -- in his opinion -- blindly reporting the characterizations without checking their accuracy.

"Is anyone surprised that the defense attorneys are spinning this case in such a way that things do not look good for the prosecution?" Nifong wrote in an e-mail to Newsweek magazine last week.

"Their job, after all, is to create reasonable doubt, a task made all the easier by an uncritical national press corps desperate for any reportable detail, regardless of its veracity," the district attorney said.

The e-mail traffic was made public by Nifong on Monday.

URL for this article: http://www.herald-sun.com/durham/4-746370.html


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 2,061-2,065 next last
To: Sacajaweau
Darn....I'm going back to my first instinct. NiFong is protecting someone from "blackmail". Where's the police chief? Since when do they leave town during a big case. These are HIS cops that will be under scrutiny!!

My first thoughts as well. No one protects a sex worker with the zeal that Mr. Nifong has exerted, unless there is a reason. Someone mentioned up thread that the family stated that they haven't seen the AV or the grandbabies for 3 weeks. She's either hiding from her pimp, social services, or perhaps both.

481 posted on 06/22/2006 1:41:38 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (If you don't understand the word "Illegal", then the public school system has failed you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: I want to know

It should be lower.

$100k is still more money then I'm sure they have liquid.


482 posted on 06/22/2006 1:41:59 PM PDT by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

:)


483 posted on 06/22/2006 1:43:15 PM PDT by Dukie07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl

Does Nifong have access to funds (taxpayer money) to support Precious and kids?


484 posted on 06/22/2006 1:43:22 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret

The Honorable Kenneth C. Titus
Judge Titus received his Juris Doctorate from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He was elected as a Superior Court Judge in November 2002. Prior to serving on the Superior Court bench, Judge Titus served as a District Court Judge and also served as Chief District Court Judge. Prior to serving on the bench, Judge Titus practiced law for several years in Durham.

Special Superior Courts Judges in Durham


http://www.nccourts.org/County/Durham/Staff/Superior.asp


485 posted on 06/22/2006 1:43:45 PM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01

As in Investigator Hyman & now Judge Titus??? LOL!!!


486 posted on 06/22/2006 1:43:50 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: Carling
$100k is still more money then I'm sure they have liquid

Doesn't "secured" mean that all they have to do is pledge assets or equity?

487 posted on 06/22/2006 1:44:10 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: Carling

It could have been better today, but at least there is some small relief for the Seligmanns. I know the pressure this has put the family under and I hope this small relief will help them.


488 posted on 06/22/2006 1:44:15 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: maggief
100K is still too high, IMO.

I think so too. Have any motions been filed concerning bond reductions for Finnerty or Evans?

489 posted on 06/22/2006 1:44:34 PM PDT by I want to know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl

Rehab?


490 posted on 06/22/2006 1:44:34 PM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Well, at least it doesn't sound like Judge Titus is out of that DA's office.


491 posted on 06/22/2006 1:44:52 PM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
I don't know. I didn't hear that part. I do know that they had to borrow $400k from a family friend to post the first bond.
492 posted on 06/22/2006 1:45:18 PM PDT by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Great another judge that served in Durham.


493 posted on 06/22/2006 1:45:37 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Carling

Is it over??


494 posted on 06/22/2006 1:46:00 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
As in Investigator Hyman & now Judge Titus??? LOL!!!


Don't leave out Woody and Hardin. :D
495 posted on 06/22/2006 1:46:10 PM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: Carling

the family had asked that it be reduced to $40,000.


496 posted on 06/22/2006 1:46:17 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: Carling

If it is secured, they put up 10%, collateral and bondsman fee?


497 posted on 06/22/2006 1:46:26 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

The weak link is the media now. The NandO, the HS. They have to be severely embarrased by this performance.


498 posted on 06/22/2006 1:46:52 PM PDT by abb (If it Ain't Posted on FreeRepublic, it Ain't News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Peach

somehow Nifong managed to say "Bunnyhole" without smirking.


499 posted on 06/22/2006 1:47:25 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: maggief

All a ho can ask for, LOL!


500 posted on 06/22/2006 1:47:46 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 2,061-2,065 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson