Actually, it were her shockingly uneducated rantings about "Darwinism" that snapped me out of my reverie.
Having read those, one can only draw two possible conclusions:
She is - well - uneducated about the subject (that is putting it in the best possible light) - or
she is just throwing red-meat to the wolves, regardless of the fact that she knows she is repeating a ludicrous lie.
Neither conclusion is particularly complimentary...
Having read those, one can only draw two possible conclusions:
Ah.
Everything is much clearer now...
Ahhhhh, methinks your judgment is clouded if you have such fierce, narrow biases about intelligent design issues.
Hmmm... looks like we're learning more about you than Ann.