Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher fights for job over topless photos online
Houston Chronicle ^ | APRIL CASTRO

Posted on 06/16/2006 5:13:41 PM PDT by Jalapeno

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Oztrich Boy

29?? Hmmm... That's a hard 29.


81 posted on 06/17/2006 12:08:39 AM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I was thinking the same thing.


82 posted on 06/17/2006 3:16:38 AM PDT by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

I remember one particular episode in the 6th grade, this one teacher I forget his name, told me to come to the blackboard to solve some math problem. And when I was up there I cracked some joke and do you know what he did? He knocked my head against the blackboard! Klonk! Can you imagine the effin` lawsuits that would come out of the woodwork for that? "My client has dizzy spells, blurred vision, has suffered intense pain and discomfort..." The teacher would be sued, the board of education, the city, the state, the blackboard maker...


83 posted on 06/17/2006 5:40:23 AM PDT by Screamname (George Noory freggin` rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Yes, he almost looks like a girl in this one...

^^^
Reminds me of David Bowie in the 1970s.


84 posted on 06/17/2006 6:10:09 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: benjaminjjones
It's not exactly clear from your post where you stand on the issue, but I don't think homosexuals, or other sexual deviants, should be teaching kids.

I guess my post was too passive -- I do that sometimes. I'm just too darned polite most of the time.

I am with you. I am of the belief that homosexuality is no different than pedophilia and that these sickos should not be allowed near children under any circumstances (let alone as a teacher or role model).
85 posted on 06/17/2006 8:05:44 AM PDT by free_at_jsl.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jalapeno
"People don't realize when they put their entire diary out there, they're giving very private information to the public,"

This, too me, is the real issue, rather than the pics themselves.

Anyone too stupid to understand the above quote, who doesn't keep their private affairs, and privates, private, is too stupid to be educating children.

Unfortunately, NEA doesn't allow stupidity or ignorance to be a cause for firing, so it takes an egregious display of idiocy to get the job done.

86 posted on 06/17/2006 8:58:16 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a petty bureaucrat hanging from every tree, he wouldn't have created so much rope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
what "agreement" - it appears to be open ended.

She has what appears to be some kind of "morals" clause.

Its open ended but on the employers side, in other words, it says what they say it says, not what she wants it to say.

FWIW. remember she is probably part of a union, and they allowed that language into the contract, which means she is screwed.

87 posted on 06/17/2006 11:31:36 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: marajade
For what?

According to the article, she broke a part of her contract (on their interpretation), i.e. she has no case, she doesn't have a right to that job, and they deemed her as breaking her agreement on a clause.

Besides, they can fire her for almost any reason they feel like, I've fired folks for a hell of alot less then this.

88 posted on 06/17/2006 11:34:22 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

She's a lez - and her 'parner' is a real bow-wow...


89 posted on 06/18/2006 1:36:36 AM PDT by Al Simmons (Hillary Clinton is Stalin in a Dress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jalapeno; All
I'm having a little problem with this - maybe there were truly offensive photos that have been removed, but I saw nothing on that website that offended me.

Methinks its the schoolhouse NAZIs on the rampage again. I guess Christians aren't the only ones targeted.

90 posted on 06/18/2006 1:38:38 AM PDT by Al Simmons (Hillary Clinton is Stalin in a Dress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

By her lesbian bow-wow 'partner'.....


91 posted on 06/18/2006 1:43:53 AM PDT by Al Simmons (Hillary Clinton is Stalin in a Dress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
"God, lesbians are dreary. They always seem to look like the human version of a garage sale."

*ROTFLMAO*

92 posted on 06/18/2006 1:46:14 AM PDT by Al Simmons (Hillary Clinton is Stalin in a Dress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

A comparison of the photos shows a good example of the fact that most women can choose to look attractive or to look unattractive - this chick is not a dog (unlike her 'partner'), and she's not gorgeous either...though she can choose to look cute with some makeup as in the first photo...or choose to look like a worn out hag like the photo you linked...


93 posted on 06/18/2006 1:50:07 AM PDT by Al Simmons (Hillary Clinton is Stalin in a Dress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons

The "offensive" photos were removed.


94 posted on 06/18/2006 7:19:47 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
Actually, the partner could be cute if she lost 30 lbs, let her hair down, put on some make-up and wiped that bitchy look off her face. And quit dressing like Billy Jean King's personal trainer. And stood up straight. And... well... okay, it would take some work. But the basic material is more or less there. Well, more more than less...
95 posted on 06/18/2006 8:49:49 AM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: free_at_jsl.com
I'm just too darned polite most of the time.

Me too, most of the time. Everyone has to "stifle it" and be PC from time to time. I know this better than most, being a consultant in the bluest of blue states, with exclusively liberal or homo clients.

I guess "stifle it" includes the folks at Fox News as well.

Mizzz Hoover showed up (with her lawyer) on FNC and they failed to ask her whether being a homo played any part in the school board's decision to ditch her.

I guess it wasn't legally germane to her current lawsuit, or FNC was afraid of being sued themselves, but it still ticked me off that they weren't informing the American public about her true nature (or unnatural nature).

96 posted on 06/20/2006 8:19:10 AM PDT by benjaminjjones (yeah, what he said)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

Cool homepage :)


97 posted on 06/20/2006 8:52:01 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson