"Why are members of the U.S. Congress proposing Bills that not only involve the United States, but also Canada, using the Office of The Secretary of State to improve the security of Mexico's Southern Border?"
Exactly what does this have to do with President Bush?
BTW: S.853 was proposed by Sen. Lugar, who is not named Bush; Ms. HARRIS (for herself, Mr. PEARCE, and Mr. SHAYS) proposed HR 2672, and none of these people are named Bush.
Why doesn't Mr. Tancredo ask these individuals what they had in mind?
This is the sort of logic that bugs me. Essentially, you inferred:
a) President Bush's plan to deal with Mexican immigration differs from yours (and mine);
b) Some Congressmen of weak conservative record (to be polite) proposed bills cooperating with Latin American countries to prevent fake documents;
therefore
c) George Bush needs to respond to the charge that he's trying to erase the United States and replace it with a North American Union?
That's like inferring that because I practice martial arts and enjoy sushi that I am planning to become a Japanese citizen.
Let's be firmly against illegal immigration, yes! But dammit, I am beyond tired of hearing invective and childish names on FR referring to our President that make DUmmies look good. We need to regain a sense of perspective.
Bush is the one who made the agreement with Mexico, and Canada at Waco on March 23, 2005. Google and read the proposals.