Replies

"Are you part of the problem - or part of the solution?"

I am not sure what problem you refer to. I have prosecuted many (probably 2 to 3 dozen) false police report cases in the last few years. I even had a young woman arrested at a preliminary hearing because she got up, recanted her story, and said she lied to the police. I have also at times been fooled by lying victims. In one case I really stuck my neck out to keep a guy in jail only to have the victim refuse to testify when I got the case ready for trial. I immediately consented to a personal recognizance bond to free the defendant (who had been convicted twice of rape before). I suspect the victim lied in the first place (I later learned a divorce was involved, and what easier target than a two-time loser), but I could not prove it. I dismissed the case on the eve of trial. All I could do was get angry. I later learned that the defense had all sorts of impeachment ammo for the victim, but they never shared it with me (nor were they required to). It was probably a lucky thing for me she refused, because I would have been beat like a drum at trial.

Lying victims are a fact of life. Lots of people try to use the criminal law as a weapon. Few succeed, in my opinion. The safeguards go far beyond the instincts of a prosecutor. In our system, even after the prosecutor decides a case should be pursued, the defense, the jury, the trial judge, and the appellate system stand between the defendant and punishment. The standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a tough standard for the prosecution to meet. As proof of that statement, look at the conviction rate for murder: only about 60 to 65% of murders ever result in a conviction. That is despite all the best efforts of the police and prosecutors to hold someone responsible in the most important of all classes of criminal cases.