Skip to comments.
DA's statements, record at odds (DukeLax)
News & Observer ^
| June 15, 2006
| Joseph Neff
Posted on 06/15/2006 2:22:31 AM PDT by abb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-254 last
To: Fido969
I did not say I believe that the child welfare rules were particularly good. The idea of taking children first and asking questions later is well-intentioned, but also very traumatic for the children. I am glad I do not make those calls because emergency custody orders do not fall under the auspices of a prosecutor's office. Social Services and the family court handle that. I may handle resulting criminal charges (if any), but by the time they get to me the defendants have all the protections of a presumption of innocence and the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If I wanted to decide child custody matters, I would run for the family court bench. I do not. If a child has truly been harmed, I will gladly prosecute the one doing the harm, though. I will say that the vast majority of Social Service actions never result in criminal charges.
I don't know where you get off saying I am too wrapped up in my job to see the results. I live with the results every day. I have tried cases that resulted in fathers being taken from their children, but I do not see the wisdom in allowing a murderer or armed robber to escape punishment merely to keep a family together (if that is what you were getting at - I'm not sure what you meant). I LIVE with the results of the criminal justice system every day. I have lost many a nights sleep over violent criminals who have gone unpunished because we lacked evidence or because a trial did not end as we wished. That really bothers me. On the other hand, I share with judges and with no other attorneys the requirement that I do justice. Prosecutors are not charged and sworn to win cases, but to do justice - to the extent the system allows it. I have dismissed many a case where I thought the defendant guilty but had no evidence. I have also dismissed cases where I had lots of evidence but thought the defendant innocent. It is a great responsibility, but I take prosecutorial discretion seriously. I even get to give people breaks occasionally when they are caught dead-to-rights.
I dare say I know quite a bit better than you what the results of the criminal justice system are (though I suspect from your tone that you may know better the results of family court matters - which I never deal with). The cost of our system is criminals who are never punished. The benefit of the system is that innocent people are seldom convicted of crimes. I can live with the cost of the system, but only by realizing that criminal justice is no such thing. It is just a procedure to punish those who leave the most evidence. Ultimate justice will come at a higher court. If I did not believe that, I would have quit this business long ago.
To: ltc8k6
Wasn't there a newspaper article, N&O maybe, that talked about Kim meeting with Crystal replete with hugging and crying? I guess Crystal forgave her for pushing her, in her red teddy and one white heel, out of a car onto the street. Too funny.
242
posted on
06/16/2006 12:12:02 PM PDT
by
RecallMoran
(Recall Brodhead)
To: RecallMoran
And Precious must have also forgiven her for helping those dastardly lacrosse players kidnap and rape her. Precious did a lot of forgiving of Kimmy, looks like.
To: Hogeye13
This would make an awesome movie. (Or my other idea of collecting illegal aliens from restaurant kitchens and lawn services to win the World Cup). You guys can do the casting.
244
posted on
06/16/2006 12:31:30 PM PDT
by
RecallMoran
(Recall Brodhead)
To: Law is not justice but process
Well, thank you for your note. As I said, I am sure you are an honest and well-intentioned fellow.
But all I have to base my understanding on is my personal experience. Which was pretty bad.
And the Duke case looks pretty bad, too.
Coincidence, perhaps.
245
posted on
06/16/2006 12:47:23 PM PDT
by
Fido969
To: All
What is Stephens going to do?
On Greta tonight, a reporter from the Durham Herald Sun, that has been on this case from the beginning, said that Nifong is not under pressure in Durham. He said he has NOT come under criticism in Durham, he said it has come from the "OUTSIDE".
Ah - the enclave of Durham and Durham Justice served like no other.
So, where is Stephens going. This is one guy that can shut Nifong down. Stephens could've listened at the first hearing and put a stop to this farce, however, he grandstanded and cut off defense attorneys and acted indignant when they sincerely tried to document all evidence and ensure their access to all information in the case - their rights, by law.
Looking for someone - anyone - that can stop the madness.
As far as someone that has authority of the Justice system - the courtroom - no one in that realm has made one little peep of criticism or raised even the most tacit questions about Nifong's case, actions, or appearances.
Any Ideas?
246
posted on
06/16/2006 10:30:08 PM PDT
by
Mike Nifong
(Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
To: RecallMoran
Wasn't there a newspaper article, N&O maybe, that talked about Kim meeting with Crystal replete with hugging and crying? I guess Crystal forgave her for pushing her, in her red teddy and one white heel, out of a car onto the street. Too funny.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
In one of her first blacked-out appearances, Kim referred to Crystal as her Sister or Sista?
247
posted on
06/16/2006 10:32:08 PM PDT
by
Mike Nifong
(Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
To: All; ladyjane; bjc
The backlog looks immense and bespeaks incompetence
Durham bespeaks incompetence.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Lil Kim said nobody bespeakin about Durham like that!
248
posted on
06/16/2006 10:45:22 PM PDT
by
Mike Nifong
(Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
To: maggief
249
posted on
06/17/2006 6:13:13 AM PDT
by
GAgal
To: GAgal
I especially liked the part about Nifong having to recuse himself if he was sued. :)
250
posted on
06/17/2006 8:21:00 AM PDT
by
Dukie07
To: Dukie07
Man! Wouldn't THAT be justice!!! Then to be beaten by Cheek with his former campaign manager's help. He'd be moaning, "Boy, ven tings go wrong!"
To: Dukie07
Since I think Nifong has personality disorder issues, i.e. he's a nut, I think he would view his forced recusal as more proof "they're afraid to face me in court".
252
posted on
06/17/2006 11:37:40 AM PDT
by
GAgal
To: GAgal
I wouldn't honestly care what he thought as long as he was out of the way so that justice could be done. This isn't about Mike Nifong (even though in his mind, of course, it is).
253
posted on
06/17/2006 12:51:39 PM PDT
by
Dukie07
To: GAgal
How smug would Nifong be if he could be sued for defamation? You guys don't understand rat politics. Nifong knows what he is doing. He is banking on a rat sweep of the legislature in 06, and a leftie rat, maybe Hitlary willing in 08. That would set his career all up.
Remeber REPRESNTAIVE Schumer defending the clintonistas over Waco? They made him a senator for that.
The radical fems running the far left will take care of Nifong.
254
posted on
06/17/2006 5:02:24 PM PDT
by
Fido969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-254 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson