Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Or Burnside or Hooker for that matter.

I've never really understood the process that resulted in the selection of those commanders (including Pope). I understand that there were political considerations that Mr. Lincoln had to factor in to his decisions. But it seems to me that the Army of the Potomac had quite a few very capable corps commanders that might have made good army commanders. Hancock comes to mind, or Reynolds.

1,129 posted on 06/28/2006 6:41:09 PM PDT by Texas Mulerider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1128 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Mulerider
I've never really understood the process that resulted in the selection of those commanders (including Pope). I understand that there were political considerations that Mr. Lincoln had to factor in to his decisions. But it seems to me that the Army of the Potomac had quite a few very capable corps commanders that might have made good army commanders. Hancock comes to mind, or Reynolds.

When Pope and Burnside were selected, Hancock and Reynolds were both still brigade and division commanders. Pope was selected on the basis of his success on the Mississippi, one suspects Burnside was selected simply because he wasn't McClellan or a McClellan insider.

1,130 posted on 06/28/2006 6:46:03 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson