Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
And you have some figures that aren't over 40 years old?

No. Do you? The figures I stated were the highest-recorded memberships, taken at the peak of the Klan's political power, and will likely never be exceeded. The modern Klan, so far as it still exists, has been politically irrelevant for decades, at least in the South.

1,041 posted on 06/24/2006 6:49:13 PM PDT by Texas Mulerider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1038 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Mulerider
No. Do you? The figures I stated were the highest-recorded memberships, taken at the peak of the Klan's political power, and will likely never be exceeded. The modern Klan, so far as it still exists, has been politically irrelevant for decades, at least in the South.

Do you even have a date for those figures, never mind recent ones? Are we talking 1967 membership? 1927 membership? What? Websites like Klanwatch show that what's left of the Klan seems to be primarily in the south.

1,042 posted on 06/24/2006 6:55:17 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson