Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vollmond

I think the best the US can reasonably hope for is to be the best team in North and Central America. At least we have pulled even with Mexico, if not slightly ahead. At least that puts us in position to be perennial WC participant.


60 posted on 06/14/2006 6:52:19 AM PDT by dfwgator (Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator
At least we have pulled even with Mexico, if not slightly ahead.

I'd say well ahead of Mexico. When was the last time they beat USA outside of Mexico City?

61 posted on 06/14/2006 6:56:08 AM PDT by kevkrom (Posting snarky comments so you don't have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
I think the best the US can reasonably hope for is to be the best team in North and Central America. At least we have pulled even with Mexico, if not slightly ahead. At least that puts us in position to be perennial WC participant.

Yes but as one Australian writer pointed out, the pool of candidates for qualification that includes the US is pretty weak tea. He claims it's intentional and that US qualification means corporate sponsorship dollars keep flowing to FIFA and it's hard to argue at times. I don't know if CONMEBOL and CONCACAF will ever mingle but perhaps moving to a different mix of qualification opponents would a) provide a sterner test for the US and b) better prepare them for WC opposition.

63 posted on 06/14/2006 6:59:49 AM PDT by relictele (Carry On The Anglosphere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

189 posted on 06/14/2006 11:17:47 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson