[nopardons]

Newbie, dear, I am NOT a "sir" and neither am I the one carrying on about some ridiculous tinfoil plot. Nor am I the one who imagines ( I would say "think", but you haven't done any of that ) that fictional books ( which you know nothing at all about! ) and a not only fictional but revisionist pseudo historical movie, are great things to use to not only bolster your delusions, but works to be taken are exemplars for contemporary behavior and reactive measures to something which does not exist!

Prove to me, first, that this country has been "sold out", stating when, by whom, for how much, and why anyone should believe you and then, perhaps I might take you more seriously; though I doubt it.

And my statement is an extremely close approximation of you and your post; most assuredly NOT of me and mine. I'm not the one belaboring the point, nor continually looking for attention..............YOU ARE!

[siznartuf]

You Wrote:

"Newbie, dear, I am NOT a sir"

I write:

You are a woman?

OK, that explains it!

No man has ever -- or ever will -- win an argument with a woman!

However, I think the onus is on you to address MY points.

You engaged me FIRST: with "arguments" that addressed everything BUT the pith of my post. I then asked you (let me count the ways)to please speak to the core of my simple SIX SENTENCE POST. I even condensed it FURTHER as fallows.

Here's what I wrote:

"Now the gist of {MY} post is:
(1)America has been sold.
(2)Our elites have been complacent.
(3)can we get our Country back?"

And further I wrote:

"You disagree with point number one.

You {write} "This nation has NOT 'been sold'"

Your "argument" is that, well... you disagree!

You can do better, I'm sure.

Please address the three simple points made in my post starting with number one.

If you can explain to me(make a case for) how our Country has NOT been sold; then you need not address points two and three(see above), as those points would then become moot.

I would much welcome -- I would rejoice -- in a refutation of my post.


SO HOW DO YOU ANSWER ME?

You answer me by using pejoratives like 'tinfoil plot' et.

This technique does not diminish the the arguments of your opponents -- it is name calling plain and simple.

You further assert:

"I'm not the one belaboring the point, nor continually looking for attention..............YOU ARE!"

WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH MY POST!

Please address my post in a coherent manner.

Simply making assertions about your opponents state of mind will not win the argument; nor will making your opponent go over, and over, and over, and over, the same ground again, and again, and again, and again, ad infinitum.

PS: I know what I wrote at the top of the page, but imagine being the first man EVER to win an argument with a woman? It "ain't going to happen" is it?