[Dog Gone]

I already told you. I don't give a crap about documents published by a private group.


They can publish whatever the hell they want, and you're free to panic. Which you obviously have.

I feel no obligation to refute what they're saying any more than I feel the obligation to refute what the Brookings Institute publishes. It just doesn't matter to me.

Don't make me try to refute your boogeymen. I'm not interested.

[nicmarlo]

Which "private" group are you referring to? The White House, SPP.gov, The Union-Tribune, Congress, "the Guanajuato Proposal," endorsed by Presidents Bush and Fox, NASCO, the U.S. Department of State, the Commission for Labor Cooperation, the North American Development Bank (which Condi Rice is a Board Member), the Texas Republican Party, or the CFR, to name just a few? I have posted links to full articles from all the above websites. I've read every article to which I've linked or mentioned. I used those articles to formulate my opinion, in addition to reading those of Corsi's.

What have you read that you could provide me which would refute the massive amount of materials coming out of all the entities above-mentioned that would contradict the implications drawn from ALL of those articles?