Replies

You have the gall to question someone else's reading comprehension skill and then write this drivel to me? ROTFLOL

My point, re Jim's replies to this thread, is that he was, according to YOU, not only hijacking this thread, but posting "silly" stuff too.

Anyone who states, with a straight face, "What does that have to do with your consistent rudeness and obnoxiousness." , whilst having been nothing but constantly RUDE and OBNOXIOUS himself, needs far more help than you can get on line. Nor does the rest of your reply deserve a civil reply; though, unlike you, I'll give you one.

Why are you so paralyzed and obsessed by my comment about the futures market? It was but a quip in reply to a post ! Is your stock of Reynold's Wrap dwindling? Are you afraid that it will now cost you more, when next you have to buy some?

The vast majority of members and lurkers don't read or post to these patently ridiculous threads and stay far, far, FAR away from you borderbots' threads.

Oh..........now I get it, you really, really, REALLY want me to go looking for ALL of your posts, so that I can be enlightened; or, do you just want an ego boost, imagining that someone is actually reading that garbage you CCP to threads? BOTH?

And what if I do decide to go hunting down your posts and find that yes, in fact, you HAVE hijacked threads; what then? LOL

Corsi has turned into a tinfoiler. These articles of his are WORTHLESS! He is NOT an "expert" nor an "authority"; just a conspiracy hack.

You and your pack hijacked the thread and proceeded to trash it, as sport. It's obvious to anybody who has a reading comprehension past the elementary school level, something you obviously must lack, since you don't understand the difference between YOUR and your friends' posts and Jim's earlier posts. Hint: there's no comparison between you all's childish prattle and tripe and how Jim poked fun of the topic and opinions of disagreement.

Since the issue isn't about Jim's posts, I fail to see why you all continue feel the need to point his posts out to me. It certainly doesn't state at the FR homepage that all people must have mind melds before they post, or is it your opinion that I'm supposed to be a Borg, or Borg-like, and am only allowed to post something that's in consensus with his views? Another hint: I'm not a Borg and I obviously don't agree with Jim's opinion on this topic, and will not ever.

If someone posts more than their personal opinions, however, which refutes ALL THE INFORMATION I posted at 263, which refers to articles located at:

The White House, CFR, the U.S. Department of State, SPP.gov, the Commission for Labor Cooperation, the North American Commission on Environmental Cooperation, the North American Development Bank (of which Condi Rice is a Board Member), North America's SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO), the North American Inland Port Network (NAIPN), the Union-Tribune, the Hutchison Ports Holdings Groupand the 2006 Texas Republican Party Platform, among others.

and that information is credible, I will take that into consideration. MY POST has much more to do with the topic about which Corsi writes, you're stuck on stupid.

And you don't "get it": you're the one who falsely accused me of hijacking other threads and then claimed that I expect you to hunt down my posts. That's future tense. Your accusations could only mean, if true, that I've already hijacked threads because you've already seen those posts. (That's past tense.) Providing evidence for your claims is all I asked. I asked only for the example from ONE thread. Don't make personal dispersions against others if you can't prove your false comments.