Skip to comments.
Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway
Human Events ^
| June 12, 2006
| Jerome Corsi
Posted on 06/12/2006 6:23:16 AM PDT by conservativecorner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 761-777 next last
To: Dog Gone
OMG, America is planning to build a ROAD!!! It's the end of the world!It is already possible to drive by interstate from Laredo to Duluth. Adding another road, though, will bring the Apocalypse down upon us all!!
This North American Union - Amero - CFR panic is not even sane enough to be called moonbat.
Anyway, we're all already doomed to become Mexican Muslim Communists because they put fluoride in our water and subliminal messages in rock music and the movies.
Even Captain Queeg thinks this stuff qualifies as paranoid.
To: hedgetrimmer
To: winodog
This wall through the middle of America will one day be used by our enemies.We're building a wall in the middle of America? Why? Is there some new kumbaya stunt called "Wall Across America" or something? I hope not because "Hands Across America" was stupid enough.
To: You Dirty Rats
Letting furriners operate the road will make it that much more difficult to move military units during a crisis. [hoot]
To: 1rudeboy
Just trying to help in my own, inimitable way.
125
posted on
06/12/2006 2:38:09 PM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: You Dirty Rats
Please refute the article. We are all very interested in seeing what you can point out to be false.
126
posted on
06/12/2006 2:39:39 PM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: beaelysium
127
posted on
06/12/2006 2:43:45 PM PDT
by
antonia
(Build the Wall Now!)
To: hedgetrimmer
One glance at the map of the NAFTA Super Highway on the front page of the NASCO website will make clear that the design is to connect Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. into one transportation system. One glance at an interstate highway map will tell everyone that there already ARE roads connecting the United States Interstate Highway System to Canada and Mexico.
There are also plenty of containers from the Far East that do not go through Long Beach.
You do realize that containers come into this country from all over the world, don't you? So what possible difference would it make if they come by sea from China to Long Beach or if they come from China to the USA via rail or truck in Mexico? Are Mexicans somehow worse than Communists?
To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; anymouse; AprilfromTexas; ...
Trans-Texas Corridor PING!
129
posted on
06/12/2006 2:51:28 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(One flag--American. One language--English. One allegiance--to America!)
To: hedgetrimmer
"Trans-Texas Corridor Because there are issues of confiscation of private land, State and National sovereignty and other similar concerns, we urge the repeal of the Trans-Texas Corridor legislation." Guess what? Nearly all new roads are built at least partially on private lands.
I guess we should build no new roads in this country. Heck, maybe we should tear up the ones we have and return the land to private ownership.
To: Drango
bypassing the Longshoremans Union in the process.
How can this be bad?
Because you hate unions you have ended up hating American sovereignty- moron!
131
posted on
06/12/2006 3:01:48 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(We should return to calling them Muhammadans -- Worshippers of Muhammad and maybe Allah)
To: You Dirty Rats
One glance at an interstate highway map will tell everyone that there already ARE roads connecting the United States Interstate Highway System to Canada and Mexico.
These roads have customs inspection points at their end points. The NAfTA highway places mexican customs on sovereign Mexican territory in Kansas City. Thats a HUGE difference my friend.
There are also plenty of containers from the Far East that do not go through Long Beach.
Currently they do not go through ports in Baja and western mexico, however through the NAFTA plan they will. How convenient for crooks and enemies of the state, they will no longer have to deal with US customs. And how awful for American citizens. They lose one more stick in the sovereignty bundle, and have NO say or authority over how goods are inspected or brought into the country because they will no longer be in charge of this vital function of a sovereign nation.
So what possible difference would it make if they come by sea from China to Long Beach or if they come from China to the USA via rail or truck in Mexico? Are Mexicans somehow worse than Communists?
More corrupt? Its hard to say. But with Mexico's mordita and China's penchant for bribery to get its way, why would any sane American risk America's security to them?
132
posted on
06/12/2006 3:08:55 PM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
A customs facility is not sovereign territory, no matter where it is located. Quit the hysterics.
To: conservativecorner
He's got it partly wrong. From Laredo to the Red River this is a Texas project, and we are well aware of wehat is going on.
134
posted on
06/12/2006 3:13:54 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Dog Gone
Nearly all new roads are built at least partially on private lands.
And if the land is condemned, is it for public use? Or for foreign corporations private gain? I bid you to review Kelo vs New London and tell me how constitutional you think it was.
135
posted on
06/12/2006 3:20:03 PM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer; Dog Gone; Diddle E. Squat; deport; maui_hawaii; Ben Ficklin; zeugma; MeekOneGOP; ...
And if the land is condemned, is it for public use? Or for foreign corporations private gain? I bid you to review Kelo vs New London and tell me how constitutional you think it was. Transportation rights of way have always involved the use of eminent domain even when it was private companies building the roads or railroads. Transportation is a public use even if the operator of the road is a private corporation.
To: butternut_squash_bisque
Don;t forget
AAMVA (American Assoc. of Motor Vehicle Administrators) and their beloved
DLA (Driver License Agreement - page 4, item 11). The DLA requirements for states to sign died in the 108th Congress Intel Legislation, it was removed from the Real ID Act (bad law still concerning licenses), now up in the immigration bill. This concerned states (US & Mexican) and the Canadian Provinces linking up their drier's license databases to become a Tri-National ID.
Ironic, the work on the DLA started in 1994, around the time that NAFTA was signed into law.
NAFTA, CAFTA, CFR, UN, NWO, guest worker amnesty program, and now this monstrosity to split America in half, and provide a super-highway for terrorists and illegal aliens, right in America's Heartland.
To: Paleo Conservative
Forget it. They're on a roll.
To: 1rudeboy
139
posted on
06/12/2006 3:28:57 PM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: 1rudeboy
Heck, look at the numbers on the North American Union BS...it's way up there.
140
posted on
06/12/2006 3:28:59 PM PDT
by
CWOJackson
(Go Mike Go!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 761-777 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson