The latest episode in this bizarre case is that the friend of the alleged victim says she was not separated from her fellow dancer/entertainer (I'm being polite in so describing them) for more than 5 minutes and that the rape story was a "crock".
At least two of the defendants can apparently prove that they couldn't have been present according to the prosecutor's time line of events.
The alleged victim has given numerous and conflicting accounts of what happened and when. There is also the evidence of her being drunk in someone else's vehicle and the testimony of the cab driver. And then there's her past charge that a similar event occured before with other men -never substantiated.
It appears the only clear motive in the whole episode was that another out-of-control prosecutor - to win an election - was willing to submit anything to a grand jury, no matter how reckless the charges.
This looks like another modified version of Tawana Brawley and Al Sharpton.
She said more than that in her "original statement" to the police. Megyn Kendall said after the so called rape supposedly occurred the 2nd striper said the False Accuser wanted to go back into the house because there was more money to be made.