Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Krodg

How did Nifong think he was going to get away with the accuser mentioning that Kim helped in the attack but Nifong doesn't indict Kim along with the 3 guys?


228 posted on 06/08/2006 7:56:17 PM PDT by Peach (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
How did Nifong think he was going to get away with the accuser mentioning that Kim helped in the attack but Nifong doesn't indict Kim along with the 3 guys?

Because he's the DA and he knows the judge...besides all those high priced lawyers are afraid to be up against him in court.

254 posted on 06/08/2006 8:14:04 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

He didn't think the defense would ever get the report. remember, the defense got this stuff from DPD, which is what is so significant about it. It's a big cover-up of a conspiracy to get these guys convicted. But the defense was wise to it, either because of their early chat with Kim when she was still telling the truth, who would have told them what all she said to the cops, or because someone inside DPD leaked it to them. i suspect the former, but either is possible. Anyway, a few weeks ago the defense got an order securing all notes, reports, messages and all records pertaining to the case in the hands of any LEA involved in the case. I think Himan balked at destroying them, no matter what Nifong might want, and, if true, it probably means Himan was acting per Nifong's instruction. If Himan didn't turn over the reports to Nifong on his own volition, he would have destroyed the records, I would think. But if it was originally Nifong's instruction to hold them back, he probably wouldn't stick his neck out that far.


257 posted on 06/08/2006 8:15:16 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

By not disclosing it to the defense. The only way for Nifong to avoid disclosing it in discovery is if he doesn't have it in his possession, and the only way to not have it in his possession is to tell the investigator or his supervisor not to give it to him, whether he says it directly or implies it indirectly through another person or through deed. These facts revealed in these reports are far too important for an investigator to make the decision to not include them as a matter of his own discretion.


262 posted on 06/08/2006 8:25:59 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson