Posted on 06/08/2006 2:03:55 PM PDT by Mike Nifong
The motion also says the alleged victim told Durham police that she had performed for a couple at a Raleigh hotel hours before the Duke lacrosse party. She told police that she used a vibrator. Osborn suggests that could be the source of the vaginal injuries mentioned in the rape kit report. (snip) Osborn says the accuser gave conflicting accounts of what happened. The motion says medical records indicate she told a doctor that she used no alcohol or drugs. The accuser told the sexual assault nurse that she had consumed one drink of alcohol and was taking Flexeril, a prescription drug used to treat muscle spasms.
The alleged victim told a doctor the next day at UNC Hospitals that "she was drunk and had had a lot of alcohol that night," the motion said.
She later told police that she had consumed a 24-ounce bottle of beer and then told police she had two 22-ounce bottles of beer, according to the motion.
(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...
Hope you don't mind my chuckling, here. Talking about it makes ya feel soiled. It brings it all back. And of course, then there's the weird looks people give ya. And how they just kinda move away as though you've got some type of communicable disease they fear catching. Yeah. I know this.
You share it; talk about it, so others might be forewarned and aware. And to become aware of the full extent by which their lives can be adversely affected when the "wrong" people, that is, the "bad people" are in charge.
You know this. I know this.
Sorry if this has already been posted ...
http://rdu.news14.com/content/your_news/durhamchapel_hill/default.asp?ArID=85715
Prosecution vs. Defense: A closer look at the Duke lacrosse rape case
Updated: 6/9/2006 6:02 PM
By: Kenneth Moton & Web Staff
DURHAM -- Indicted Duke lacrosse player Colin Finnerty’s lawyer, Bill Cotter, filed three new motions in the rape case Friday. The motion said more discovery evidence from District Attorney Mike Nifong is needed.
(snip)
http://www.news14charlotte.com/content/top_stories/default.asp?ArID=121501
The flow of paper from the defense continued Friday, as Finnerty's attorneys filed three discovery motions seeking reports from two police officers who were with the accuser in the hours following the party before she arrived at an area hospital. They also sought original notes and documents from investigators, and more detailed reports on all photo lineups conducted by investigators.
When in doubt, post. We ain't like the dinosaur newspapers who always try to eliminate news stories so they can put advertising in its place. Plus we don't have to buy newsprint paper, either...
No more black fingers from the newsprint either. :)
Carpal tunnel instead.
LOL!
Oh, look ... Nifong speaketh ... different case.
http://www.herald-sun.com/durham/4-742910.html
You mean his tongue hasn't be cut out??
You mean his tongue hasn't be cut out??
Are the details from the GJ kept from the DA himself?
Thanks abb!!
That is what I thought when they went to the park.
WTF????????
ABC news (GMA Saturday) about to do story on DukeLax...
OK...thanks again!
Some people aren't comfortable when you get emotional too.
It brings out the passions and raises the octaves in your voice, I know that.
thanks
It's a secret but he knows ...
"My understanding is they had a few very specific questions the investigator was not in a posture to answer," Nifong said of jurors. "It's obviously a secret proceeding, so I don't know specifically what the questions were, although I have a general idea."
Great article! Explains the Bob Bennett connection.
Precious is not alone in needing psychiatric care.....Nifong is a prime candidate for intervention for chronic lying.
Another WTF ... Why weren't these three opitions given the GJ in the LAX case?
From the Herald-Sun link above:
Still, the District Attorney's Office submitted the case to grand jurors this week in what was known as a "presentment."
The jury had three options. It could have asked prosecutors to seek an indictment against the shooter. It could have recommended that the case be dropped. Or it could have asked for more information.
Jurors chose the last option.
Asking for a further inquiry, they reported that circumstances surrounding Anderson's death "have not been sufficiently investigated by law enforcement authorities."
Since Nifong evidently did not present the above case to the GJ, was this a different GJ from the one that Nifong used?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.