Posted on 06/08/2006 2:03:55 PM PDT by Mike Nifong
The motion also says the alleged victim told Durham police that she had performed for a couple at a Raleigh hotel hours before the Duke lacrosse party. She told police that she used a vibrator. Osborn suggests that could be the source of the vaginal injuries mentioned in the rape kit report. (snip) Osborn says the accuser gave conflicting accounts of what happened. The motion says medical records indicate she told a doctor that she used no alcohol or drugs. The accuser told the sexual assault nurse that she had consumed one drink of alcohol and was taking Flexeril, a prescription drug used to treat muscle spasms.
The alleged victim told a doctor the next day at UNC Hospitals that "she was drunk and had had a lot of alcohol that night," the motion said.
She later told police that she had consumed a 24-ounce bottle of beer and then told police she had two 22-ounce bottles of beer, according to the motion.
(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...
That's an outrageous ruling, and if the plaintiff won, there would be excellent grounds to get it overturned.
;;;;;;;; -- Here's all you need to know about Durham
CORRUPTION ALERT... CORRUPTION ALERT... CORRUPTION ALERT...
By Ray Gronberg : The Herald-Sun
gronberg@heraldsun.com
Jun 9, 2006 : 11:23 pm ET
DURHAM -- An auditor in the city housing department is trying to obtain RESTRAINING ORDERS against all three of his supervisors and has helped swear out a criminal complaint against the department's director.
The auditor, Nicholas Eze, claims city Housing and Community Development Director Mike Barros, department Associate Director Katherine Simmons and Program Accountant Jesse Leake have been harassing him on and off the job. He wants a judge to bar all three from speaking or contacting him.
(snip)
My comments: A Durham Magistrate agreed with the auditor - Eze. The Magistrate orders caused Barros to be arrested.
CITY MANAGER, PATRICK BAKER INTERVENES. He takes no action against Barros (whom was arrested) - and states he has NO PLANS to place him on leave. INSTEAD, BAKER put the complaintant (Eze) on administrative leave. BAKER says for
"other things in the workplace," NOT THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT - Nothing to do with that. Big coincidence.
Eze is a program accountant. Didn't the accountant sink Al Capone?
Durham is a total mess.
Poisoned Water, Mercury exposure, led poisioning, gangs
http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-742956.html
Who knows? If there's ever any kind of trial, their steps throughout the day will be scrutinized, and we'll find out - if any of them tell the truth, that is.
being the engineer that I am, I'm trying to work out how someone ends up being 20% of any race
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Sorry. I hit the muscle relaxers and Malt Liquor pretty hard last night.
Maybe he meant 1/4 and hit the 5 instead of the 4. Dunno.
In cases like this we have to find the humor where we can. : )
I think I understand your post and in my opinion Johnson and the AV changed their destination by stopping at his parent's home before going to her parents home. Some sort of disagreement altered the plans. They talked it out on the couch, went into the bedroom for something ... sex? drugs? Then it seems all hell broke loose again when she spilled her drink on his cell phone.
Your post was quite polite, btw. Was mine not? If not, it was not intentional. :)
Maggief,
No. Not at all. I was re-reading and thinking mine was poorly written.
I missed a lot. JLS gave me the link for some PDF documents that showed Jarriel's exact written statement. I'm sure you had posted it and read it earlier and I missed it.
It's clear to me that you, jezebelle, and JLS were right. They had a disagreement. After he gets her back into the car, he says we went back to his parents house and talked it out.
I think Jarriel's statement shows they have a contentious relationship. She's on the phone at the carwash, and then he tells her I'm taking you home (something angered him).
Then, later, after she spills her drink on his cell phone, he takes her home.
Later when his cell phone doesn't work (from the spill), he calls her and tells her he is not able to drive her that night.
You were onto all this stuff yesterday.
Some one suggested that when Johnson and the AV were driving around they may have been looking for a dealer. By reading your posts I am wondering if they may have been looking for johns.
Another thing ... Johnson knows the AV's children and her parents are shocked she's an "exotic dancer?" Just who do they think he is ... her tutor? LOL
That dreadful Meadows woman. I think I'll just call her Dread-o's from now on. :)
Interesting ....
From the WaPo:
The parents went to Durham to cheer their sons, and held group meetings. The mother who used to assign parents' tailgate duties was now e-mailing daily news coverage. The one news outlet they felt was challenging the prosecutor's narrative was "The Abrams Report" on MSNBC, hosted by Dan Abrams, a Duke alumnus. They started funneling him tips.
From what Hannity's been saying on his TV and radio show, he's linked up with them, too...
Perhaps Megyn too?
Lol, maybe that's why Nancy Grace was so red in the face last nite. No one will talk to her anymore since Nifong's gone mute....
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/10/duked-out-men-must-demand-change/
Duked Out: Men Must Demand Change
June 10, 2006
Duked Out: Men Must Demand Change
Source: David R. Usher | Published 10th June 2006 @ 01:37 In Vox Populi, BullsEye, David R. Usher, VOA Human Rights and Law, VOA Social Issues | 1 Comment
Many questioned my position that the Duke Lacrosse rape case was a “crock” from the onset. I called the case on April 12th in my article “[1] The Hazards of Duke: Predatory Feminism”.
I was very comfortable making this call. After 19 years of studying false abuse cases, I can smell a warthog long before it gets near the living room. A full recount of the case, and a timeline addenda of case events is located in the above article for those who would like a recap.
The Duke Lacrosse rape case bore all the classic hallmarks of a false case. Would anybody believe that even the most loutish college men would rape a woman in a busy college party bathroom? My college experience suggests this is an impossibility.
The Duke scandal did not happen by accident. It was an intentional slaughter of men in the feminist Colisseum brought about by federal VAWA (Violence Against Women Act) and VCA (Victims of Crime) funding. Multitudes of men are taken advantage of every day in divorces and criminal actions every day in similar fashion. The one difference: the little guys get squashed.
These programs are abundantly unconstitutional for one simple reason: they ensure that equal protection and due process are not provided at law, based solely on the sex of the victim.
Federal funds are dollar votes that bring about exactly what they fund. If federal dollars funded only prosecution of Eskimos we would see prisons full of them, and the State of Alaska would suffer all the problems associated with a lack of inhabitants. This illustrates why father-absence is such a tremendous problem in the American family, and why so many men are living in prison or on the fringes of society as “deadbeats”.
Federal programs fund investigations, treatment, prosecutions, and incarceration only if the alleged victim is a female or a child. Police, psychologists, clinics, prosecutors, prisons, lawyers, and free legal services behave in strict concert with the funding. Men who are abused are on their own against the hurricane force of governmental criminal systems and media outlets who lynch men in public before looking to see if a case has any merit whatsoever.
Every day we see men released from prison after twenty years of incarceration because DNA proved their convictions were garnered by something other than fact.
Every day we see women being arrested for having sex with minors. Why do these women get automatic custody of the baby when they get pregnant? Is it not a brutal to order child support against a teen boy who was raped? Should the victim become a career servant and financier of the criminal?
Has anyone ever seen a woman arrested, prosecuted, and locked up for thirty years for lying about rape and destroying the life of a good man? Has any woman ever had to pay restitution to her victim?
Has anyone seen a woman held responsible for lying about her use of birth control in order to become an entitled single mother at the expense of marriage, husbandry, and fatherhood? There are multitudes of men served up on this platter of predatory feminist motherhood.
Men must demand respect and raise cain until we get it. We demand equal and fair treatment under the law. We demand that sexist programs be ended. Federal funding must not discriminate against men or deny them procedural due process or availability of services.
We must now grant to fathers the same right to be in the family as we have granted to women in the workplace. We will not settle for Senatorial political burial or whitewashing by the media.
No matter whether you are a liberal or conservative male or mother, a loaded gun is pointed at you or your son (respectively).
This father’s day, let us make an oath of brotherhood to speak out, to vote against any politician who either supports feminist initiatives, fails to openly support equality for men in family and society, or pretends that discrimination against men is not a problem.
We shall not donate to any charity that funds feminist programs or does not fund programs that help men. The United Way is at the top of this list.
Last, we shall not date or marry any woman who ascribes to modern liberal feminism, or who does not actively support equal rights for fathers to be in the family and to have full and equal protections under the law.
[2] David R. Usher is President of the
American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition
Ha! Too funny ... who does she have? That Kevin Miller guy ... who's reluctantly veering over to the defense position. I think Miller thought he could be the next Ted whatshisface from the Scott Peterson trial, who got a gig on CNN.
She was all by herself last nite. Not one of her guest TH's would drink the koolaid...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.