Posted on 06/06/2006 9:41:05 AM PDT by Perdogg
Here's a hint: find something else to do to earn money.
we're talking about the "little girls" who were so intimidated and felt so unsafe that they performed sex acts on each other?....and neither knew the other one?.....
I WANT this "dancer" on the stand......
Definitely sends chills down my spine. Ewwwwwww
good one.....LOL.....
Goslee is an ignorant racist, plain and simple. she's also as dumb as a box of rocks.
Goslee is delusional. She really is. If she doesn't like a particular piece of information, she simply states that it doesn't exist by writing it off as defense spin. Even Nifong admitted there was no DNA match, yet Goslee just glosses right over that as though it never happened. She is totally out to lunch, and a die-hard racist. I truly despise her. She was obviously an affirmative action appointee to her federal prosecutor position because she doesn't have a brain in her head, and the same thing occurred when she took her bar exam - just pass her because she's black.
I've also emailed him. I basically told him he can get rid of her or get rid of me as a viewer - his choice - because she is a brainless racist.
She's going to make a much better witness, hostile as she is, for the defense than she will for the prosecution. She's a dumb broad full of arrogance and deceit.
This is a "bubble-gum" piece. Kim looks "hard". This piece intends to soften her "image".
Unfortunately, there are plenty of stupid feminist females who think "just" like Goslee. They each think they are red queens.
http://www.herald-sun.com/durham/4-741884.html
$22,850 is bill for DNA testing
By John Stevenson : The Herald-Sun
jstevenson@heraldsun.com
Jun 6, 2006 : 9:19 pm ET
DURHAM -- It cost taxpayers $22,850 for DNA testing at a private laboratory that failed to find a conclusive link between Duke lacrosse players and the alleged March gang rape of an exotic dancer, according to papers filed in Durham County Superior Court.
The paperwork includes an invoice from DNA Security of Burlington for analyzing 23 "evidence specimens" at $450 each and 50 "reference specimens" at $250 each.
Also included is an order, requested by District Attorney Mike Nifong and signed by Superior Court Judge Ron Stephens, requiring state officials to pay the bill immediately.
(snip)
Oh my. Pay it immeiately? What's the rush? There's no need to have an immediate trial is there? I mean, the Judge said that it wouldn't be moved ahead of other matters. The trial won't be held until 2007. Of course the bill should be paid, because the people who did the work are entitled to be paid, but aren't there other more pressing and deadlier crimes awaiting DNA testing? What was the rush Mikey? Hmmmmmmm???
"Consistent with" and "inconsistent with" are trick phrases. They appear in an article about SANE testimony in a Virginia case. http://www.nursingworld.org/TAN/janfeb02/html
Gee....Why did that address turn red in my previous post? Did I do something wrong?...or something right?
Very true, and none of them realize how ridiculous they apear to normal, rational people.
Hyperlinks of the posts are all red, not blue.
I wonder if Durham is a slowpay?
Question for anyone--indicted or unindicted, will these DNA specimens go into a data base?
Wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that NiFong picked everything up personally. I would guess that it would be highly unusual given the "chain of custody" rules. Did he break the rules?
When the media first saw the pictures, there was a description given of one that mentioned one dancer apparently on top of the other. Yesterday, Dan Abrams was more to the point, indicating that they were buck naked, performing sex acts on each other.
1-800-BITE-ME
I called that number and it appears to be disconnected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.