Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tammy8

One problem is that the wolves they are re-introducing are not native to the lower 48 states, hence that's why they call them Canadian wolves. The native wolves from 100+ years ago ran in the range of 40-50#, not the 150+ that is roaming our western states and moving east and south.

There was an article in Western Horseman magazine a year or two ago about a man and his wife riding in Idaho and a pack of wolves was circling their camp one night. The next day a wolf started for the wife and the husband, carrying a rifle, dropped it when it was within 10 feet of his wife.

The family and I are heading for the mountains of Wyoming with our horses in a few weeks and I'll be carry a rifle and a sidearm. The wolves and cats are getting bolder all the time. No sense taking any chances.


68 posted on 06/06/2006 10:32:35 AM PDT by Sgt. Stryker ("Saddle Up, Saddle Up")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt. Stryker

The larger size may explain the hunger issue that many say causes them to be even more dangerous. I can see where a wolf that size might have a problem finding enough food on a regular basis in the drier areas of the country where some have been introduced. I had never heard that the wolves being introduced were so much bigger than what was here naturally before. Thanks for that info.


71 posted on 06/06/2006 10:37:14 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Build a Real Border Fence, and secure the border!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson