Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: al_c
I remember playing in a league in Austin where one such powerhouse team was in the mix. Rolling subs were allowed and they beat the crap out of everybody else in the league because they always had fresh players out on the pitch. Smaller teams like ours rarely stood a chance against them.

I was working under the assumption that each side had an equal number of players on its team. I guess if Luxembourg has 30 players and the US has 200 players on the sideline, this would be a problem.

Is there really no limit to how many players can be on a World Cup team?

And just to be clear, I was suggesting allowing subs only in deep overtime, not all game long.

SD

59 posted on 06/06/2006 8:38:51 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave

Yes, teams have a limit on the number of players.

Ok, if you want to allow rolling subs then you shift the emphasis on who needs to attack. As it is, the better team has the incentive to attack lest they risk going out in a penalty shootout. This gives the weaker team the opportunity to counter attack.

Allow rolling subs I extra time and the stronger team in theory has more incentive to defend and flood the pitch with different good players in extra time.

Personally I think the former scenario is preferable.


62 posted on 06/06/2006 8:48:56 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave

In small leagues like the one I described, there are really no regulations like that. The professional leagues of course have limits.


65 posted on 06/06/2006 9:02:57 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson