Replies

Go back and read your post #298.

What? Because I don't want to pay for the survival of dopers I'm now a hypocrite? Just because I think a guy who busts his butt in construction all day should be able to kick back with a beer? (or two or twenty) If I'm following your thinking, because the above scenario is legal, a subject should be able to do a couple of lines of cocaine?
Just have a bit of difficulty following your reasoning.
And I admit, having seen some beautiful young ladies get hooked on meth, then turned into sh*t dipped in misery does color my thought process.
If you know the doper world, then you know it's based on predatory behavior. These maggots are always looking for some sweet young thing to get hooked, then support their (the collective "their") habits.

Which part of "I'm against us having to pay for their living/medical expenses" did you not understand?

Go back and read your post #298.

I understood my post; it's you who seems to be having trouble.

Just because I think a guy who busts his butt in construction all day should be able to kick back with a beer? (or two or twenty)

Quit evading the subject ... I'm not talking about him, I'm talking about the guy who you and I have to support because of his alcohol abuse. Why isn't your continued support for the legality of the drug alcohol conditional on your not having to support its abusers, since you take that position with regard to other drugs?

having seen some beautiful young ladies get hooked on meth

Never seen anyone get hooked on alcohol? I have ... it's not pretty.