Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Software Foundation: Free as in "do what I say"
InfoWorld ^ | May 29, 2006 | Neil McAllister

Posted on 05/31/2006 7:19:40 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat

Stallman-headed group's increasing politicization leaves a sour taste

When Richard Stallman created the Free Software Foundation (FSF) in 1985, it was organized around a radical idea: Software should be free, not just as in free of charge, but free as in the concept of liberty. During the next 20 years that idea turned out to be not just radical, but surprisingly practical. Beginning with Stallman's Emacs text editor, to the various Gnu utilities, the Linux kernel, and beyond, free software has proved to be an enduring success.

Much of the credit for that can be given to Stallman himself. Through his tireless campaigning, he has transformed this idealistic notion into something that the wider world, and even the business community, can accept and take seriously. Although it may not always be easy to agree with him, his arguments have been rational, and if nothing else, intellectually consistent to the last.

All the more reason to be disappointed by the FSF's recent, regrettable spiral into misplaced neopolitical activism, far removed from its own stated first principles. In particular, the FSF's moralistic opposition to DRM (digital rights management) technologies, which first manifested itself in early drafts of Version 3 of the GPL (Gnu General Public License), seems now to have been elevated to the point of evangelical dogma.

The FSF's most recent effort -- an anti-DRM protest staged at Microsoft's WinHEC conference last week, complete with demonstrators costumed in hazmat suits -- was particularly troubling. It signals a shift in the FSF, from an advocacy organization to one that engages in hysterical activism cut from the PETA mold.

(Excerpt) Read more at infoworld.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: drm; fsf; opensource; stallman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: antiRepublicrat

Stallman is a radical leftist, whose admitted goal is to make proprietary software obsolete, and have everyone pay a "software tax" to the government instead. Unfortunately, many fall for his bribe of "free software for all", selfishly ignorant of the dangers it represents to the security and economy of the US.


21 posted on 05/31/2006 10:47:49 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
As to fair use if they do violate it that needs to be handled in court not through laws

It doesn't quite work that way. First, the consumer uses the copyrighted work. Then he gets sued. Then if he has enough resources to fight it instead of just getting steamrolled, he uses fair use as a defense.

The copyright cartel never liked the concept of fair use. Since even they can't flat-out have fair use revoked, they restrict content through technical means, then pay for the law to be changed to make illegal the means to exercise fair use despite the restrictions.

Aside from that, truly effective DRM can be dangerous in the long run. Works that are out of copyright (if Congress ever allows that to happen) will still be effectively in copyright when the copyright expires, since nobody will be able to access that public domain work without the publisher's permission.

I prefer the title "content restriction," since that's what I was using before the copyright cartel invented the term "DRM."

22 posted on 05/31/2006 10:53:36 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

DRM only "SUX" as you say for those who have nothing of their own valuable enough to need protection, but who wish to remove the ability of others to protect things they have that are of value. In other words just because you may not have anything of value, doesn't mean there aren't others who do, who don't wany to give it to you for free just because you'd like to have it for yourself without working for it.


23 posted on 05/31/2006 10:56:55 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

I can rip a cd to my hard drive without DRM...


24 posted on 05/31/2006 10:58:36 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Good 'ol Linux, PcLinuxOS my flavor of choice. :)

Yes. I hear you are the official shill for them. :-) 

25 posted on 05/31/2006 11:05:18 AM PDT by zeugma (Come to the Dark Side... We have cookies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Do you have this on a template to post up whenever open source is mentioned?

whose admitted goal is to make proprietary software obsolete

Actually, no. He wants the for-sale software market to be obsolete -- the market will decide whether that happens, and the market will be right. Writing your own and keeping it to yourself or writing it for somebody under contract and they keep it (both examples of proprietary software) is fine with him.

and have everyone pay a "software tax" to the government

Like most leftists, he naively thinks the government is the answer for everything. I almost want this wish of his to come true so he can see how screwed-up the software would end up being.

Unfortunately, many fall for his bribe of "free software for all", selfishly ignorant of the dangers it represents to the security and economy of the US.

You still haven't been able to prove any net damage. Sure, some companies will go under because they can't face the OSS business model. That's also why there aren't too many buggy whip makers left.

26 posted on 05/31/2006 11:06:09 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

no, someone else here is the official shill, i'm the unofficial one. :)


27 posted on 05/31/2006 11:09:27 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
DRM only "SUX" as you say for those who have nothing of their own valuable enough to need protection

I have two copyrighted programs out there, and neither is open source. I hate DRM. I can always go after pirates the old fashioned way and ruin them with statutory damages. Nailing a dozen of them would more than compensate for any lost income, depending on the damages awarded.

but who wish to remove the ability of others to protect things they have that are of value

But who wish to be able to exercise their traditional rights in relation to copyright, such as fair use and first sale.

28 posted on 05/31/2006 11:16:50 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
DRM only "SUX" as you say for those who have nothing of their own valuable enough to need protection

And if you decide to be an ass and say my programs aren't valuable enough to matter, remember that Avril Lavigne, Sarah McLachlin and Barenaked Ladies have all spoken out against DRM. Whether they're any good is irrelevant, as they represent millions of dollars of music income.

29 posted on 05/31/2006 11:21:29 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Once again you don't know what you're talking about, "make proprietary software obsolete" is listed as his "ultimate goal" right on his own websites. Go search for those words in quotes if you don't believe it.


30 posted on 05/31/2006 11:24:17 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Once again you don't know what you're talking about, "make proprietary software obsolete" is listed as his "ultimate goal" right on his own websites. Go search for those words in quotes if you don't believe it.

As usual, you don't know the whole story. The bits about contracted software are on his site too.

31 posted on 05/31/2006 11:28:25 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

If i were a musician I wouldn't allow music companies to put DRM on my music they don't own it I do.


32 posted on 05/31/2006 11:34:20 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
If i were a musician I wouldn't allow music companies to put DRM on my music they don't own it I do.

They almost did. Several years ago a congressional staffer snuck a few words into a telecommunications act that added musicians to the categories of works eligible for work for hire, meaning the RIAA could own the music of artists completely, and forever. The RIAA denied it of course, saying it must have been a mistake by someone in Congress. Then they "worked with Congress" to correct the mistake and fix this threat to the artists that they protect.

Sounds good. Simple mistake, right? Except that they hired that staffer with a fat salary right after the law was passed.

33 posted on 05/31/2006 11:42:35 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

I believe some musicians do not allow apple to sell their music on iTunes... maybe thats why?


34 posted on 05/31/2006 11:47:25 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Sure, some companies will go under because they can't face the OSS business model. That's also why there aren't too many buggy whip makers left.

Buggy whips were replaced by newer and better technology, not leftists giving away clones of buggy whips for free as part of their socialist dream for the future.

35 posted on 05/31/2006 11:50:21 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Buggy whips were replaced by newer and better technology

It's a metaphor for not being able to change with the times, numbskull.

36 posted on 05/31/2006 11:53:44 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

No it's a stupid analogy free software freaks make all the time, and I just showed why. Of course leave it to you to claim our times are changing to Stallman's socialist utopia, which obviously isn't happening either.


37 posted on 05/31/2006 11:58:52 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
No it's a stupid analogy free software freaks make all the time, and I just showed why.

Since you can't understand a metaphor, I'll try something more direct. IBM had a hell of a time struggling with the new business model that appeared with multi-vendor PCs. In fact, their lack of ability to envision this new business model lost them billions by letting Bill Gates keep the right to sell MS-DOS to anybody.

IOW, companies stuck in their old ways suffer with new business models.

38 posted on 05/31/2006 1:51:46 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Another poor analogy, as "desktop computers" were newer and completely different technology. That's nothing like foreign open source clones like Linux and MySQL, which aren't new technology but rather just inferior freeware dupes of our already existing products.


39 posted on 05/31/2006 2:37:34 PM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Another poor analogy, as "desktop computers" were newer and completely different technology.

They didn't lose because of technology. Remember, they were the first to produce PCs, they were ahead on the technology, with others playing catch-up after Compaq started the legal clone business. What they didn't forsee was a business model where there was competition on the same platform -- kind of like how most proprietary software companies didn't forsee competition from another business model, open source.

That's nothing like foreign open source clones like Linux and MySQL

Hmmm, Compaq makes computers that behave like IBM PCs and compete with IBM PCs, Linus makes an OS that behaves like UNIX and competes with UNIX. Sounds exactly alike.

BTW, MySQL is a clone as is pretty much any other RDBMS used today, since they all mostly follow the same rules. MS SQL Server is a blatant copy of Sybase SQL Server, which came out years after IBM's DB2.

Probably the only true original RDBMS is DB2, which has its roots in the work of an IBM employee, Dr. E. F. Codd (another one for you to look up). The worst part for you is that Codd was a foreigner!

40 posted on 06/01/2006 5:56:57 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson