Conspiracy theories generally are the refuge of those who do not understand what is happening and are attempts by them to explain things they are incapable of grasping. Those involving the CFR, the Federal Reserve merely prove the ignorance of those proposing them. This belief is the equivalent of blaming sickness on "Evil Spirits".
Practical politics will never be found among those believing such fraudulent theories. We have NOTHING to fear from such phony sources of power. We have EVERTHING to fear from an electorate so ignorant that they elect hundreds of RATS in every election. Who needs a conspiracy when the electorate is half blind/deaf/dumb?
What is even funnier is the paranoia about socialism when it is on its last legs worldwide having lost its strongest support, the USSR. We certainly have nothing to fear from a backwater like Cuba. China is backpedalling away from Marxism as fast as it can and still save "face".
"Tragedy and Hope" is essentially out of circulation and too expensive for me to purchase used but does not claim that Globalists are out to run the world. Quigley argued that there is a Anglo-American alliance to do so which requires nothing secret.
It is YOU who should read the widely available publications of the CFR since they in NO way propose what you claim they propose. Most of these are position papers and are not even consistent within the same volume. Often there are several viewpoints argued by the different authors. There is NO "official" CFR line of thought.
Since you seem to know so much about CFR, are you a member, justshutup?
I'll invite you to challenge. If you want to start a thread where we post ACTUAL, REFERENCED, SOURCED documentation on the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, it's published statements, and quotes from it's members, I'll gladly provide support for my position.
So far in your statements, you simply denigrate my position without offering any substantive evidence that it is incorrect. I can easily support my opinion with sourced quotations and facts. Let me know when you want that discussion to begin.
It is usually the case that elitists and party-liners are unwilling to entertain such a discussion, for fear of lending "credibility" to the position of conspiracy theorists. They never confront fact with fact. If you choose to accept this proposal, let's agree to only post sourced information and not express an opinion of our own. Care to enter the battle with facts in hand rather than dismissive personal comments?