Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All; JLS

You make excellent points, but we'll have to disagree on your final point about Nifong possibly dropping the case.

Like the Cold War with Russia, the strategists were told to think like the Russians when predicting their plans.

I don't know if Nifong in his enclave of Durham sees the case realisticly. Durham has had 3 University protests against these boys and the electorate in the City is absolutely hostile towards the LAX players. I saw Nifong laughing in Court when Seligman's attorney mentioned his alibi. I've heard reports that Nifong speaking off the record is still very confident, just very upset.

And then, if the Change of Venue is not granted, Nifong has a real chance.

I think back to the Totally Unbelievable comment Nifong made
when asked about a report of the AV saying it was 20 men first and then 3. He said he wasn't aware of that, and he said if a statement like that was made, he didn't think it would be relevant. 20 men or 3 men - not relevant. I think that Nifong is out of touch with reality.

Maybe he had high hopes for this case and the National position in the Media or Politics following it. Dreams die Hard.


61 posted on 05/28/2006 10:16:14 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Nifong

Since I told you I am an economist, it should not surprise you that I do better with rational, ie sane, behavior than irrational behavior. Sowell too is an economist, so we tend to see things the same way.

Of course maybe Nifong is in fact certifiable. Then Sowel and I are out of our element.


64 posted on 05/28/2006 11:01:27 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson