Tom Bevan responds to McCann's article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/realclearpolitics/20060531/cm_rcp/so_what_if_the_duke_accuser_li
DA says more evidence is coming
Calling him a conservative is pretty low blow. Perhaps McCann was trying to regain some "street cred" with his latest commentary.
McCann is basically saying the lax guys deserve whatever happens to them because they're white, even if Mangum is lying, even though he tries to couch it in terms of them partying instead of their skin color being what is motivating his remarks. The fact that McCann even included the caveat, "....even if the accuser is lying" tells me that he KNOWS she's lying.
Can somebody tell me what the respercussions might be if a white journalist posed the conclusion that no matter what happened to Mangum that night, including rape, she deserved it because she's black, even if it was couched as "because she's a stripper" instead of writing "because she's black"?