Yes. GAgal hit drove the nail home!
The Investigator doing the lineup kept the AV on track. That is correct. Remember, anything she says incorrectly in the lineup - anything can be used to question her recollection of the night.
Another point in that lineup, the AV says someone was in the BEDROOM - and it's clear that the Investigator steers her back into her story and she changes it to comport with her story AFTER the investigator Prompts her -
It goes something like this:
AV: He was in the bedroom
Investigator: BEDROOM?
AV: Yes.
Investigator: I'm sorry , did say BEDROOM?
Av: I mean the LivingRoom
You know, just a thought :
If somebody had dealt with the AV's prediliction for making false accusations back when she accused three males of trying to rape her; or when she accused her former husband of trying to take her into the woods and kill her--
then she wouldn't have been able to make yet another false accusation against the players.
But since making false accusations apparently carries no penalty at law, she is free to be a "serial accuser".
Good Lord, just when I think this thing can't get any more obviously a setup, it gets more obviously a setup.
Check this link below. Durham man arrested for rape. Tried to run from the cops. Bond set at $150,000. Absolutately unbelievable. The Duke boys turned themselves in and got $400,000. Nifong lied again. He said their bonds were normal.
http://www.herald-sun.com/durham/4-739380.html