Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Golden Eagle
Sure, he could abandon those users, like Apple

Apple didn't abandon, they provided an upgrade path.

First, they included "Classic" running within OS X for OS 9 applications. This environment sometimes ran OS 9 programs even faster than booting straight into OS 9 on the same hardware.

Second, they provided dual-booting into OS 9 and OS X for those rare programs that just wouldn't run under Classic.

Third, a couple years prior to OS X, Apple released an API that contained about 95% of the system calls normally used in OS 9 applications, requiring little modification to most programs to this API. OS 9 programs conforming to this Carbon API could run on OS X natively.

Fourth, for the transition to Intel, Apple built in a seamless emulator for PPC applications. You don't even know it's running unless you check. For those people using XCode, compiling your program to a universal binary (PPC and Intel) is simply a checkbox.

I wouldn't call that abandoning users.

61 posted on 05/27/2006 11:14:14 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

I specifically mentioned Apple abandoning the Apple II users, but like most of my points it was either over your head or before your time.


65 posted on 05/30/2006 7:12:18 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson