[MHGinTN]

But not quickly enough to satisfy someone asking care givers 'when is that bitch gonna die'. Look at the time line from the date the monies were awarded and the entrance of the euthanasia movement and the petitions to courts to 'put her down'. Compare the rhetoric of the husband prior to the monies awarded and following the awards. Notice the onset of 'another comforting woman' into the husband's life in conjunction with court awards and appeals to courts to withdraw sustenance and 'let her die' ... and we could go on and on and on profiling a monster, a sociopath, a ghoul, but what's the use, the media tells us their polls prove Americans don't care to examine this case beyond soundbyte foolishness.

[Scotswife]

Michael was enjoying the comfort of other women even before he began his euthenasia campaign. One woman was even with the blessing of Terri's parents.

My point is that one doesn't need to actively injure someone to contribute to their deterioration.
One can simply deny basic treatment and stimulation so that neglect and isolation can do the work.