well, then what was she there for?? stripping for money is prostitution, pure and simple....
it's not so much as what your article states as it is a prosecutor running for re-election and willing to run rough-shod over these young men's lives to get that re-election for himself...shoot first, ask questions later...
Someone at the WAPO should do some investigating before they print their crap.
"They said that she [the alleged victim] was cracked out [on drugs?] and offered her body for sexual favors...the lacrosse players refused for fear of catching STDs and began making jokes...she ran into the bathroom, 'cracked out'...there was a dispute over payment...and she left [angrily?]. There was no rape committed by Duke lacrosse players."
101 posted on 05/24/2006 9:56:13 AM PDT by Publius22
From a ethical point of view you may be correct, from a legal one you are wrong. The law defines stripping as a legitimate profession and prostitution as a crime in every state except Nevada, where both are legal.