To: Sensei Ern
I thought this thread died well over a week ago.
My comment was meant to be humorous and a bit of a rant at the same time.
What it implied is that the pit bulls would turn on their owners if they were hungry enough. The steak would have acted as a catalyst. Thats the natural order of things as I see it.
I admit that I hate pit bulls, and if I ever see one one my property, I will shoot it dead immediately. I don't mind people owning them, I just want to make sure they are the right kind of people taking care of them. Far too often, they are people not fir for taking care of themselves, and should not have a breed of dog capable of causing so much damage if they snapped.
394 posted on
06/02/2006 10:51:14 AM PDT by
Theoden
(Fidei Defensor)
To: Theoden
Just be clear:
Along with likely everyone else on this thread opposed to 'breed ban laws', I have no problem whatsoever with anyone defending their person and/or their property by any means necessary.
We, again speaking for all, simply accept the view of virtually every reputable animal welfare body in North America that such bans both don't work & are inherently unfair and, as good conservatives, believe any law should rightly be focused on individual responsibility and personal accountability.
In short: throw the book at negligent dog owners but don't pointlessly & wrongly target the vast majority of otherwise law-abiding, responsible dog owners or their pets based solely upon their dog's supposed 'breed'.
395 posted on
06/02/2006 12:27:19 PM PDT by
GMMAC
(Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
To: Theoden
I thought this thread died well over a week ago.LOL...There's been a few things needed airing.
398 posted on
06/02/2006 1:05:07 PM PDT by
kanawa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson