[GMMAC]

"The program can be paid for with fees for the course and increased license fees, with fees for "strong/tough dog" breeds being higher."

Hardly the first indication we've see that you're quite plainly no philosophical conservative ... snicker!

What you're advocating is absolutely no different from - and based upon the same 'government knows best', social engineering mindset which justifies - openly discriminatory sky high taxes on everything from gasoline to liquor to tobacco.

Face it - you're a pro nanny-state socialist !!!

[BJungNan]

Hardly the first indication we've see that you're quite plainly no philosophical conservative ... snicker! What you're advocating is absolutely no different from - and based upon the same 'government knows best', social engineering mindset which justifies - openly discriminatory sky high taxes on everything from gasoline to liquor to tobacco.

You proposed the educational training for dog owners, not me. I accepted your idea.

As for paying for it, you think the rest of society should pay for your owning a dog. No way. You want the dog, you pay for its upkeep. Next you will think you have some right to have the government pay for its food.

I really can not figure you out. Just who should pay for your dog? This should be an interesting answer. I can't wait to hear it.