Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle
Thank you, This is a new idea to me.
Guilty or not, this seems like a hammer hanging over your head for the life.
2 posted on 05/20/2006 2:34:48 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

What gives me such a bad feeling that Nifong may do this is that NC was the only state to have such a draconian law in the first place. The notion that lawmakers and judges of NC thought this was constitutional and a reasonable measure when the statute was tested suggests that the legacy of that thinking is still present there. Geez, they don't even have probable cause hearings before or afterr indictment there. Vendetta and harrassment seem to be a primitive mainstay in NC law which really does remind me of feudal law, so I can't help but think Nifong will choose this route. It also makes it easier for Mangum to be successful in any civil suits she brings if there's no actual acquittal by a jury.

Once the defense has all the discovery, I think they should consider having Reade file a civil suit against Mangum, especially if there is good indication of malfeasance on Nifong's part in bringing the case. It's probably the only way to tear Nifong's house down.


3 posted on 05/20/2006 3:22:49 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson